Well, she's right that straight tobacco is far less harmful than with all the chemicals that big tobacco adds in the making of one of their cigarettes.LMAO at the caller at 11:50, Anne from Maryland. In short:"I worked at the NIH. It's the vapes and added chemicals in cigarettes that are killing you. God did not invent tobacco to kill us. Everyone should roll their own cigarettes, and watch a wolf in sheep's clothing about Saul Alinski, and thank god for Donald Trump!"
I don't know about "far less harmful". The added chemicals don't help, but the most harmful constituent of cigarette smoke, by far, is the tar and carbon monoxide, which is present in any form of cigarette smoke. It's just not good to burn plant matter and inhale the smoke deep into your lungs. Oh, and it's not the vapes that kill you.Well, she's right that straight tobacco is far less harmful than with all the chemicals that big tobacco adds in the making of one of their cigarettes.
If there were no taxes on cigarettes everybody would love ecigs and Gilbert and Han Lic would share the Nobel prize for medicine.People who do not vape are going to fall for the government/media's narrative of ... oh, we need to only allow closed systems, so that no bad people can add bad things to the liquid, like the black market did with THC. In my opinion, we need to get them to understand why would we trust big tobacco, who would be the only one left standing, to create our nicotine e-liquid, considering all the carcinogens they added to cigarettes, that have nothing to do with tobacco? I think they would understand that.
I mean this with the utmost respect to vaping and your (in a better world, good) idea about the “show and tell.”The host was really trying to understand. At some point, I think we need to do a version of show and tell. For example, take a mod, a tank, a drip tip and say, a couple of different flavors of a line of e-juice, each at different mgs of nicotine. Most people don't understand why PMTAs will devastate most. They think e-cigs are all just all-in-ones and that an e-liquid is just an e-liquid. They think what's the big deal...just do a PMTA. They don't understand that it would require many millions for just one non-pod device and many, many for a company's line of juices. And then just point at the various items and say 1 million, 1 million, 1 million, etc.
I wasn't criticizing him. I am the one who asked that same host last week when I called in to invite him.If there were no taxes on cigarettes everybody would love ecigs and Gilbert and Han Lic would share the Nobel prize for medicine.
Greg Conley has had years, mostly under the radar, to perfect his message. Nobody on either side of the issue comes close. Hopefully the community and industry will be giving him more support.
An unfiltered view of what's happening in those hearings, etc. I totally agree.CSPAN is great.
It's about as entertaining as a root canal, but if you can get past the lack of pizazz it's by far the best provider of information your government is perpitrating on its citizens.
Kudos to you. You made a convincing argument, and hit most of the major points, in a short amount of time.I wasn't criticizing him. I am the one who asked that same host last week when I called in to invite him.
vaping | C-SPAN.org
It would have been too early for Greg to do what I suggested. I was talking about at some point.
I was not intending to criticize you in any way. Conley earns his hero status for laboring in reletive obscurity for all these years and now his moment has come and we're lucky to have him.I wasn't criticizing him. I am the one who asked that same host last week when I called in to invite him.
vaping | C-SPAN.org
It would have been too early for Greg to do what I suggested. I was talking about at some point.
I agree. He's pretty great.I was not intending to criticize you in any way. Conley earns his hero status for laboring in reletive obscurity for all these years and now his moment has come and we're lucky to have him.