OK, I need to get another thing straight.
You all want to trust the government with your health care, when this very same government is pitching tobacco cigarettes as "e-cig cessation devices"?
Sheesh!
Trust the government with your well being, but do so at your own peril.
The problem here people is cost. You take care of cost, most of the problems with access goes away.
Eliminate the AMA's limit on the number students alowed in accredited medical schools, and loosening the restrictions on state licenses for doctors.
More doctors = more competition = lower cost.
Nationalize the market, so that we can shop around for the best deal. Currently, you can only buy insurance available in your own state.
More choices = more competition = lower prices.
Limit the reward amounts OR Institute a loser pays approach in Malpractice lawsuits.
This will reduce insurance costs, and the cost of performing "defensive" medicine.
We want to encourage good lawsuits and limit the "junk ones
You all want to trust the government with your health care, when this very same government is pitching tobacco cigarettes as "e-cig cessation devices"?
Sheesh!
Trust the government with your well being, but do so at your own peril.
The problem here people is cost. You take care of cost, most of the problems with access goes away.
Eliminate the AMA's limit on the number students alowed in accredited medical schools, and loosening the restrictions on state licenses for doctors.
More doctors = more competition = lower cost.
Nationalize the market, so that we can shop around for the best deal. Currently, you can only buy insurance available in your own state.
More choices = more competition = lower prices.
Limit the reward amounts OR Institute a loser pays approach in Malpractice lawsuits.
This will reduce insurance costs, and the cost of performing "defensive" medicine.
We want to encourage good lawsuits and limit the "junk ones