I wonder How Many Policy Makers are considering this...
Juul Doesn't Need To Advertise To Young People. Everyone Else Is Doing It For Them
Juul Doesn't Need To Advertise To Young People. Everyone Else Is Doing It For Them
Depends on what you consider that success as. Me, I’m still in the “...... to school kids” camp. They created a really really addictive product that was easy to hide and produced a high. Stuff like that sells itself.Organic advertising, what we used to refer to as "word of mouth", is the better than any advertising that can be bought with money.
Now it looks like all entire nanny-state wants to punish juul for their success. What they never ask is: How many of the kids who use a Juul sometimes would have taken up smoking instead if there were no such product?
Bah, the EU's TPD 2 directive that limited nicotine levels to 20 mg/ml in the 28 member countries was written well before Juul existed as a product, and Juul didn't enter those markets until after they were well established here in the US, in other words, quite recently.The countries that limited nicotine levels on JUUL (and there were a bunch of them) didn’t have a problem where masses of kids vaping and all vaping one product.
A distinction without a difference. The laws were in place, and JUUL couldn’t break open the marketBah, the EU's TPD 2 directive that limited nicotine levels to 20 mg/ml in the 28 member countries was written well before Juul existed as a product, and Juul didn't enter those markets until after they were well established here in the US, in other words, quite recently.
True. So what do you think that 50mg does then?My personal view is: I don't care if kids vape. If it keeps them from smoking, that's A Good Thing, just like it is for adults.
Oh, and someone who's never used nicotine can get a fine buzz from a single hit of 18 mg.
Sheesh, give them some time; they had about a three year head start in the US.A distinction without a difference. The laws were in place, and JUUL couldn’t break open the market
The same buzz with a smaller puff.True. So what do you think that 50mg does then?
the problem is almost that old though.Sheesh, give them some time; they had about a three year head start in the US.
What little data we have on n-benzo disagrees with that.The same buzz with a smaller puff.
True. The thing is though there were vapes around for many years and it wasn’t that big a deal. Then JUUL hit the scene and suddenly BAM! It’s too specific and too sudden.How many wish vaping was a thing when we were kids sneaking around? Not once have I read anyone mention they wouldn't have jumped on whatever the current band wagon was at the time. I simply can't get onboard with vilifying Juul or any other company for this reason. We would have found a way back in the day with or without advertising influences too.
I disagree, the more exposure the better. Vaping is gaining ground but not fast enough to have a strong voice concerning legislation. The sin tax was always a given, not sure why people are upset by that part. The added taxes plus the sin tax is what I find unreasonable.True. The thing is though there were vapes around for many years and it wasn’t that big a deal. Then JUUL hit the scene and suddenly BAM! It’s too specific and too sudden.