There are so many devices on the market that are identical, or almost so, yet have different names. eGos vs. Rivas vs. Tornados, for example: I would assume a patent would cover the design sufficiently that a slightly different battery size or difference in dimensions would still violate the original.
I know patent/copyright enforcement is lax in China, where e-cig hardware still originates from. So maybe there's little that can be done if ordering from China. However, for the U.S. retailers, the current climate so favors patent-holders that it would seem to be a simple matter to fire out cease-and-desist letters for selling "knock-off" products. I assume the U.S. retailers would rather resell "genuine" products than deal with a court case.
So what gives? I always thought Joye invented most of this stuff but I read somewhere Janty claims it created the eGo. Is anyone getting royalties on every 510 product, for example? Just curious.
I know patent/copyright enforcement is lax in China, where e-cig hardware still originates from. So maybe there's little that can be done if ordering from China. However, for the U.S. retailers, the current climate so favors patent-holders that it would seem to be a simple matter to fire out cease-and-desist letters for selling "knock-off" products. I assume the U.S. retailers would rather resell "genuine" products than deal with a court case.
So what gives? I always thought Joye invented most of this stuff but I read somewhere Janty claims it created the eGo. Is anyone getting royalties on every 510 product, for example? Just curious.