Is eCig hardware a free-for-all ripoff market, or are there patents in play?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ColKurtz

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 8, 2009
131
18
Raleigh, NC USA
There are so many devices on the market that are identical, or almost so, yet have different names. eGos vs. Rivas vs. Tornados, for example: I would assume a patent would cover the design sufficiently that a slightly different battery size or difference in dimensions would still violate the original.

I know patent/copyright enforcement is lax in China, where e-cig hardware still originates from. So maybe there's little that can be done if ordering from China. However, for the U.S. retailers, the current climate so favors patent-holders that it would seem to be a simple matter to fire out cease-and-desist letters for selling "knock-off" products. I assume the U.S. retailers would rather resell "genuine" products than deal with a court case.

So what gives? I always thought Joye invented most of this stuff but I read somewhere Janty claims it created the eGo. Is anyone getting royalties on every 510 product, for example? Just curious.
 

ericdjobs

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 19, 2011
249
56
39
Northern CA
There would be so much prior art and easily proven prior art. I'm sure we will see our fair share of patent trolls.. matter of fact I believe there was already one... had to do with variable voltage. I believe it was the people or person who makes the Buzz and the Infinity.. they won a patent for a variable voltage PV, then tried to collect royalties from any company selling a VV PV, when there was prior art all over the place and more than likely the idea was gleamed from reading an ECF thread in the first place.. I wasn't around when it happened, I just remember reading about it... This sort of behavior is wrong in my opinion.

If you read the modders forum.. you see it happen from time to time. Someone will post their amazing new product/design, and a couple months later you'll see some random company selling a pre-fabricated version. This isn't inherently wrong (I personally believe the original designer deserves compensation, but others will disagree), but credit should at least be given. If the same random company were to take out a patent on said product, then turn around and issue cease and desist or royalty demands on everyone else selling it... total douche bag move.

I believe Ruyan, the original inventor of the e-cigarette, tried for a long time to collect royalties... but nobody was paying them. Chinese manufacturing isn't hampered by all the silly IP stuff that holds us back in the USA. They straight up ignore patents. If anyone is going to patent ANYTHING e-cig related and try to make a royalty claim, they better have records to show they've been paying Ruyan! :)
 
Last edited:

VapPornRules

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 22, 2011
191
85
NYC
Chinese manufacturing isn't hampered by all the silly IP stuff that holds us back in the USA. They straight up ignore patents.
I agree with you somewhat but the lack of patent/IP protection can also hamper innovation. People spend ALOT less money on R&D if they can't cash in down the road.

I mean, you could say - but look, there is immense innovation going on by modders, suppliers, etc., but think about it from the perspective of the suppliers. How much MORE might they spend on coming up with the perfect Carto if they knew they could hold exclusive rights on it? Why pay a team of engineers (or even 1 engineer!) tens or hundreds of thousands of $ when they will get maybe a couple of months of exclusive sales out of it?

Both systems have advantages and disadvantages.
 

nocturn4l3030

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 17, 2011
890
158
South Bay, CA
i always wondered about this tbh..so if someone were to come out with say.. a self feeding design like the eclipse or some everlasting cartomizer/atomizer...why "havent" companies/inventors started to patent their stuff?

with just a glance at the modders forum, theres.some neat .... over there, but for obvious reasons, theyre not posting designs, so its kind of sad to see.
 

Uncle Willie

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 27, 2011
2,395
102,486
Meet Me in St Louie Louie
The PV cat is out of the bag, essentially .. to step in now and attempt any sort of monetary collection would cost more than it was worth in legal, and even more in collection costs and enforcement .. and what do you patent .. ?? A battery .. ?? No .. Liquid .. ?? No .. An atty .. ?? Maybe .. A Carto .. Maybe ..
 

fray

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jan 13, 2011
1,555
518
arkansas
www.ejoose.com
There would be so much prior art and easily proven prior art. I'm sure we will see our fair share of patent trolls.. matter of fact I believe there was already one... had to do with variable voltage. I believe it was the people or person who makes the Buzz and the Infinity.. they won a patent for a variable voltage PV, then tried to collect royalties from any company selling a VV PV, when there was prior art all over the place and more than likely the idea was gleamed from reading an ECF thread in the first place.. I wasn't around when it happened, I just remember reading about it... This sort of behavior is wrong in my opinion.

If you read the modders forum.. you see it happen from time to time. Someone will post their amazing new product/design, and a couple months later you'll see some random company selling a pre-fabricated version. This isn't inherently wrong (I personally believe the original designer deserves compensation, but others will disagree), but credit should at least be given. If the same random company were to take out a patent on said product, then turn around and issue cease and desist or royalty demands on everyone else selling it... total douche bag move.

I believe Ruyan, the original inventor of the e-cigarette, tried for a long time to collect royalties... but nobody was paying them. Chinese manufacturing isn't hampered by all the silly IP stuff that holds us back in the USA. They straight up ignore patents. If anyone is going to patent ANYTHING e-cig related and try to make a royalty claim, they better have records to show they've been paying Ruyan! :)

I believe notcigs is still in a patent pending status. He did not try to collect royalties, but was required to inform other companies making products that fell into his patent aware of his pending patent.

I believe his intention is to license out to other VV makers
 

Valsacar

Ultra Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 16, 2010
1,778
243
Seoul
Keep in mind Ruyan didn't invent the e-cig, that was done sometime around 1950 (and a patent was issued for it). They did what a lot of Asian companies are very good at, took it and made it better (then called it a new product).

On the Janty/Joye thing, Janty is the designed (therefore the one that created it), Joye is the manufacturer (therefore the one that made it).
 

Cool_Breeze

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 10, 2011
4,117
4,291
Kentucky
The PV cat is out of the bag, essentially .. to step in now and attempt any sort of monetary collection would cost more than it was worth in legal, and even more in collection costs and enforcement .. and what do you patent .. ?? A battery .. ?? No .. Liquid .. ?? No .. An atty .. ?? Maybe .. A Carto .. Maybe ..

This world needs a good $5 carto with replaceable coil and wick.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,615
1
84,710
So-Cal
I don’t think it is so much Patent Rip-Offs as it is OEM Branding.

Picture ONE Huge factory the size of Vermont that is churning out PVs in China. You want it in Lime Green. No problem. They just run you of 1,500 units and away you go. You want to call it the “FUBAR eGo”, they can laser etch that on it also.

Sure, there are knock offs out there. But I believe the Majority are traceable back to one OEM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread