Hey forum!
I'm brand new here. I tried vaping for the first time two days ago and it blew my mind. My first device was a single-use, disposable version. Then I bought the next level up--the $15 Maya thing that resembles a real cigarette and comes with a USB charger.
I realize now that vaping will be a long-term activity for me and I'm trying to decide what equipment to buy. I think it's pretty unusual when a product category has a single leader, acknowledged by almost everyone as the very best. But that's what we have here, no? In my short time exploring this forum and other online resources, I've found that everyone seems to agree Provari beats all the competition on every variable other than price. Some people complain it's not worth the extra money, but no one says the Provari doesn't work as well.
Could someone help me quantify the actual premium one must pay in order to take the Provari route?
It looks like there's a big difference in the cost of the device at the very beginning. The difference between the Provari and the next best option might be as high as $100. But what about the operating costs? Must Provari users also pay more than other people pay for consumables or maintenance?
Or perhaps the price difference works the other way around? Maybe saving $100 by not buying a Provari is a false economy because the Provari is more durable and has a longer lifespan, or maybe the Provari is more efficient in its consumption of cartridges or whatever?
$100 might be a big difference in terms of percentages. But I suspect that when I switch to vaping exclusively I'll save tons of money over what I pay now for about a pack a day of regular cigarettes. If switching saves me thousands of dollars per year, then the extra $100 wouldn't feel like a lot of money.
I'm inclined to start with the Provari. I value things like durability and build quality. If I buy something cheaper, I'll probably want to trade up quickly to the better option anyway. And it sounds like the Provari is so well built that people are actually surprised by how nice it feels. Like it's an exquisite little tool, like just holding it in my hand would make me happy. Whereas the cheaper alternatives feel cheap in one's hand, right? If I'm going to interact physically with this thing for hours each day, then it's important for me to enjoy touching it.
Am I missing something here?
Should I get the Provari V2 or the Mini? I'm inclined to get the mini for its portability. The V2 just seems enormous--it's longer than an iPhone and it weighs more--and the battery life of the mini is already adequate, or I could keep a spare battery and charger nearby. What's the best way to these things?
Finally, does anyone know if the devices are attracted to magnets?
Thanks,
ZJB1
I'm brand new here. I tried vaping for the first time two days ago and it blew my mind. My first device was a single-use, disposable version. Then I bought the next level up--the $15 Maya thing that resembles a real cigarette and comes with a USB charger.
I realize now that vaping will be a long-term activity for me and I'm trying to decide what equipment to buy. I think it's pretty unusual when a product category has a single leader, acknowledged by almost everyone as the very best. But that's what we have here, no? In my short time exploring this forum and other online resources, I've found that everyone seems to agree Provari beats all the competition on every variable other than price. Some people complain it's not worth the extra money, but no one says the Provari doesn't work as well.
Could someone help me quantify the actual premium one must pay in order to take the Provari route?
It looks like there's a big difference in the cost of the device at the very beginning. The difference between the Provari and the next best option might be as high as $100. But what about the operating costs? Must Provari users also pay more than other people pay for consumables or maintenance?
Or perhaps the price difference works the other way around? Maybe saving $100 by not buying a Provari is a false economy because the Provari is more durable and has a longer lifespan, or maybe the Provari is more efficient in its consumption of cartridges or whatever?
$100 might be a big difference in terms of percentages. But I suspect that when I switch to vaping exclusively I'll save tons of money over what I pay now for about a pack a day of regular cigarettes. If switching saves me thousands of dollars per year, then the extra $100 wouldn't feel like a lot of money.
I'm inclined to start with the Provari. I value things like durability and build quality. If I buy something cheaper, I'll probably want to trade up quickly to the better option anyway. And it sounds like the Provari is so well built that people are actually surprised by how nice it feels. Like it's an exquisite little tool, like just holding it in my hand would make me happy. Whereas the cheaper alternatives feel cheap in one's hand, right? If I'm going to interact physically with this thing for hours each day, then it's important for me to enjoy touching it.
Am I missing something here?
Should I get the Provari V2 or the Mini? I'm inclined to get the mini for its portability. The V2 just seems enormous--it's longer than an iPhone and it weighs more--and the battery life of the mini is already adequate, or I could keep a spare battery and charger nearby. What's the best way to these things?
Finally, does anyone know if the devices are attracted to magnets?
Thanks,
ZJB1