Is there a tank system that does not need wicking??? Just a coil and tank ?

[Vap3ster]

Im curious to know is there any tank system that does not require wicking of any kind. Just a tank with a coil somehow incorporated into it.

Preferably the tank would be made out of glass or metal.


Also been curious what supplies would I need to be able to rebuild a kanger protank using metal mesh wicking.

 

[Horselady154]

It's expensive, but here... AMP Tank - Avid Vaper

 

[wv2win]

Sure there is. It's what probably the majority who use tanks actually use. Get one of these:

Phiniac Rugged Pyrex Glass Tanks

And then put one of these in it:

Tank Replacement Dual Coil Cartomizers, 1.5 ohms, Triple Hole

 

[Vap3ster]

OK I just looked at the AMP tank. Wouldn't the 510 atomizer that goes into it still have it own wick/foam material inside it.

Im thinking about just a coil and tank to eliminate the wicking/ insulation material that I assume cant be so great to inhale all the time.

If im wrong is there a picture of the inside of the amptank atty

Im currently using a protank. Im thinking like if somehow I could have my protank but without the wick.

 

[DiNet]

Vaping at 400 Watts - YouTube

p.s. No. You can't just put wire into liquid and vape it with your battery.

 

[Vap3ster]

Sure there is. It's what probably the majority who use tanks actually use. Get one of these:

Phiniac Rugged Pyrex Glass Tanks

And then put one of these in it:

Tank Replacement Dual Coil Cartomizers, 1.5 ohms, Triple Hole

Thank yea that's what I was thinking. But whats inside the Tank Replacement Dual Coil Cartomizers, 1.5 ohms, Triple Hole Other than the coil does it still have the soaked foam material?

 

[wv2win]

Thank yea that's what I was thinking. But whats inside the Tank Replacement Dual Coil Cartomizers, 1.5 ohms, Triple Hole Other than the coil does it still have the soaked foam material?

Yes, it has a poly-fil material like all cartomizers. Unless there is something out there that I am not aware of, you basically only have two choices if you do not want any poly-fil like material used when vaping: direct dripping on an atomizer or a rebuildable atomizer that you make yourself and has a tank that it fits in.

 

[crxess]

Short answer - No
even dripping atomizers have a wire Mesh surrounding the coil to hold liquid.

 

[wv2win]

Short answer - No
even dripping atomizers have a wire Mesh surrounding the coil to hold liquid.

Thats true. Although if you "de-bridge" them I would think that would be closer to what he is looking for. I tried it once and found it was a PIA and not worth it, IMO.

 

[crxess]

Thats true. Although if you "de-bridge" them I would think that would be closer to what he is looking for. I tried it once and found it was a PIA and not worth it, IMO.

That is why the HH357..............going to have to try one someday

 

[wv2win]

That is why the HH357..............going to have to try one someday

I don't think I will go there. If I found I really liked it, I would want to go back to dripping which is a hassle to me. I'm in the car a lot and just don't want to fool with dripping again.

I want someone to start making RBA's that are already made and when it's usefulness is finished, I just buy a new one. I'm past the "fiddle" excitment I had when I first started vaping. I want it to be simple and hassle free in my old age, lol.

 

[SilentScreams]

OK I just looked at the AMP tank. Wouldn't the 510 atomizer that goes into it still have it own wick/foam material inside it.

Im thinking about just a coil and tank to eliminate the wicking/ insulation material that I assume cant be so great to inhale all the time.

If im wrong is there a picture of the inside of the amptank atty

Im currently using a protank. Im thinking like if somehow I could have my protank but without the wick.

That tank utilizes a dripping atty which has a wick and coil but no poly filler. That would be the tank you want if you do not want to use a cartomizer which has poly fill wicking material.

You could also use a bottom feed clearomizer like the Vapeonly BCC or Kanger Pro Tank. Which uses a wick and coil at the bottom of a filled tank. The Vapeonly is pretty nice and inexpensive. The Kanger Pro Tank isn't to bad on price but I do not know about function as I have not used one.

 

[Baditude]

There's a few options the OP can look into:

The previously mentioned Amp Tank is new development in juice delivery devices using a drip atomizer in a tank. The AMP Tank allows you to use 510 and 306 dripping atomizers in a tank with 3 ml or 5 ml of e-liquid capacity in a fused quartz glass tank. The AMP Tank 510 Submersible Atomizer Tank is sold exclusively by AvidVaper. Below is a demo of this tank:

The AMP Tank - 510 Submersible Atomizer Tank From AvidVaper - YouTube
_________

I've not seen it for sale here in the US yet, but the Killer 705 atomizer http://www.greekvapes.eu/KILLER_705/p1666110_8236248.aspx is a stand alone atomizer which you can submerge into any tank previously made for a cartomizer. I honestly don't know much about it, but there are some threads here on ECF on this device. Here's a video of a demo.

Killer 705 Atomizer - houseofmods - YouTube

_____

As someone mentioned previously, a bottom feeder box mod would suit your needs. Again, a device that feeds a dripping atomizer, but it has a built-in tank within the mod that holds the juice. You squeeze the tank through the mod's opening to drop more juice into the atomizer. The Reo and V-mod by Vampage are two common examples.

http://www.reosmods.com/

http://www.vapage.com/V_MOD_s/173.htm

____

The Vape Mate is a device that fits on any tube mod and turns it into a bottom feeder mod. Super T ~ Vapemate

 

[billo]

I don't see any wick, and definitely no poly filler, in my eGo type B atomizer. You just replace the heating element when it burns out and it rarely needs cleaning.

 

[Butters78]

Just curious why you are afraid of wicks?

 

[The Ocelot]

The Kanger Protank kinda doesn't have a wick, it's really teeny.

 

[Ken_A]

The Kanger Protank kinda doesn't have a wick, it's really teeny.

hehe... that's just like being sort of pregnant.

 

[DaveP]

Haven't bought the Kanger Protank yet, but it looks like something I will buy when it's available in quantities. Being able to remove the bottom and service the wicks is a plus, but there's no way to syringe out the remaining juice before you do. I'm used to removing any juice with a syringe before I disassemble my Vivi Nova. It looks like you have to invert the Protank and support it that way for filling and maintenance. Not a problem, just different.

 

[Absintheur]

The Killer 705 is a stellar piece of gear. Works very well and is simple to set up. I am running mine in a 7ml tank on a Bombshell Stinger...lot's of juice on a Kicked 26650 battery for all day vaping...

 

[Baditude]

The Killer 705 is a stellar piece of gear. Works very well and is simple to set up. I am running mine in a 7ml tank on a Bombshell Stinger...lot's of juice on a Kicked 26650 battery for all day vaping...

Ab, thanks for posting and for the excellent pic. I must admit not knowing much about the Killer. How did you get yours (co-op?), how does it compare to a cartotank, is there any sort of learning curve, and which tank is that? Is that a 7ml Valley View Vapes Triple V pyrex tank or an IBTanked? Is there any recommendation for the type of tank it will work best in?

Thanks in advance.