Joyetech 510 Tank Atomizer Quicky Review....

Status
Not open for further replies.

mwa102464

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Oct 14, 2009
14,447
12,564
Outside of the Philadelphia Burbs, NJ & Fla
Cozz,

Is the flavor also muted in these like it is in the Ego-T's ? To me the Ego-T still need some work like a 3ml stainless steel tank cart, a bigger opening in the needle and some wick changes, the opening in this new Atty you just reviewed also looks bigger than the T is it ?
 

cozzicon

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 19, 2010
2,564
900
Chicago IL
Cozz,

Is the flavor also muted in these like it is in the Ego-T's ? To me the Ego-T still need some work like a 3ml stainless steel tank cart, a bigger opening in the needle and some wick changes, the opening in this new Atty you just reviewed also looks bigger than the T is it ?

It must be uneven production or quality control. I have not had muted flavor on any of the 5 eGo-T atties I've used.

So I can't address that directly.
 

JollyRogers

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 30, 2009
2,537
1,070
Virginia
My first two ego-t atties I got from TW and both had wicking issues. I burned one up (just quit on me while on travel!) and the other is still going, though I modded the wick myself so it would work worth a darn. I decided to buy an actual ego kit figuring if I didn't like these t-atties, I could always use the batteries. First thing I noticed was the piercing needle was fatter then the original run I got from TW. These two atties perform awesome. Great vapor, good flavor, and with 100% pg I am getting OK TH.

Thanks for taking the time to put a video up Coz. I think if you are running an eGo type, then the A or B tank is your best bet, but if you are running a standard 510 batt, then go with the 510-T. That would be their purpose. The other thing to note, the 510-T will work on ANY 510 mod with NO adapter, whereas the Tank atty requires some modding or the new 510-eGo adapter when/if available (I saw them at HC). I read that 510 cart would hold .7ml vs. the 1.1 of the tank type A. If I buy more tank atomizers, thinking I will have to go to type B...
 

cozzicon

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 19, 2010
2,564
900
Chicago IL
My first two ego-t atties I got from TW and both had wicking issues. I burned one up (just quit on me while on travel!) and the other is still going, though I modded the wick myself so it would work worth a darn. I decided to buy an actual ego kit figuring if I didn't like these t-atties, I could always use the batteries. First thing I noticed was the piercing needle was fatter then the original run I got from TW. These two atties perform awesome. Great vapor, good flavor, and with 100% pg I am getting OK TH.

Thanks for taking the time to put a video up Coz. I think if you are running an eGo type, then the A or B tank is your best bet, but if you are running a standard 510 batt, then go with the 510-T. That would be their purpose. The other thing to note, the 510-T will work on ANY 510 mod with NO adapter, whereas the Tank atty requires some modding or the new 510-eGo adapter when/if available (I saw them at HC). I read that 510 cart would hold .7ml vs. the 1.1 of the tank type A. If I buy more tank atomizers, thinking I will have to go to type B...

That's a pretty good perspective.

I sort of enjoyed vaping a small round mouthpiece again with the 510 tank. But like I said in the review capacity is a problem for me.

I'll probably stay on the type "A" atties just because that's been what I'm running. But who knows.

More likely you'll find me with a type "A" on one of those Jessy batteries (assuming they fit).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread