I wouldn't be surprised to find out some of these things are stunts. I'm convinced hoaxes are used on a much larger scale to mold the public perceptions. Why not ecigs
I thought the same - the guy from CHEST Dr. Graham Atkins may have had the 60 year old come into the hospital - had lung problems (he was a lifetime cigar smoker)... and thought 'how can we tie this into e-cigarettes. Perhaps he asked a dozen earlier patients and none that vaped and found a guy who did and voilà! Here's one we can 'use'!! Then had Kristi from EurekaAlert! write up a fake headline to gain attention (later retracted but only after Dr. F contacted them with how ridiculous the story was as well as the headline.) and 'Mission Accomplished!'
Not that different from
Mannmade (from hockey stick hoaxer Michael Mann ) global warming. Or the 97% 'consensus' (Cook) that was actually " 0.3 percent of all 11,944 abstracts or 1.0 percent of the 4,014 expressing an opinion, and not 97.1 percent." The 75% consensus (Oreskes from Inconvenient Truth), actually 7% endorsed it explicitly.
And they all get Gov't grants for 'studies' that conform to their intended regulations. And when actual scientists like Burstyn, Hayek, Polosa, Le Houezec, Kozlowski, Nutt (the good one), Dr. F, et al. and others show how the junk studies were fudged - they're attacked and get little time (if any) at the FDA, ACA, ALA, et al. seminars to show their results.