Yep, we could name them "tobacco is Satan," and pols would STILL follow the money trail. It's just the way it is/was always going to be (IMO) and I remember that first "How to explain what your e-cig is so you can vape on a plane and wherever," as a very bad, bad idea. It wasn't that I disagreed with it in principle.... I was more like, "These are going to get big. We should be quiet about them for as long as possible."
With that said, hiding them would only have delayed the inevitable as well as stopping them becoming more widely used/known by ex-smokers, so it's frankly just the worst double bind on offer.
E-cigarettes/vapes/panda's greatest success have become the reason we are under attack. It was inevitable, regardless of whatever method/name was used.
Heck, we could have named them "Hillary and Bill Clinton," and they would have been under attack.
I wonder if (smoker) Obama ever tried one, prior to demonization by the (under his leadership) FDA? I'm guessing not, if he was willing to self identify as a "you know what" smoker.
Anna
With that said, hiding them would only have delayed the inevitable as well as stopping them becoming more widely used/known by ex-smokers, so it's frankly just the worst double bind on offer.
E-cigarettes/vapes/panda's greatest success have become the reason we are under attack. It was inevitable, regardless of whatever method/name was used.
Heck, we could have named them "Hillary and Bill Clinton," and they would have been under attack.
I wonder if (smoker) Obama ever tried one, prior to demonization by the (under his leadership) FDA? I'm guessing not, if he was willing to self identify as a "you know what" smoker.
Anna