Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bombastinator" data-source="post: 23734964" data-attributes="member: 43994"><p>You’ll be interested in the 510 connector then.&nbsp; This was the original problem with ecigs.&nbsp; The ultimate evolution of that path iS the top fill RTA which uses non proprietary everything.&nbsp; Basically the 510 was the connector for the Blu. They screwed up their patent application though and anyone could use it.&nbsp; It wasn’t the best connector out at the time, but it was decent, strong, and it took higher power well so it became the standard.&nbsp; Its like usbC beating lightning.&nbsp; UsbC is basically a bad rip of lightning.&nbsp; Its sort of inside out lightning and does more or less the same thing, but is more complicated to make and harder to clean.&nbsp; But USBC is not proprietary, so It got iterated on and made faster, whereas lightning didn’t.&nbsp; So now lightning is worse and apple is annoyed because lightning arguably IS better.&nbsp; Lightning is gonna die though.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="bombastinator, post: 23734964, member: 43994"] You’ll be interested in the 510 connector then. This was the original problem with ecigs. The ultimate evolution of that path iS the top fill RTA which uses non proprietary everything. Basically the 510 was the connector for the Blu. They screwed up their patent application though and anyone could use it. It wasn’t the best connector out at the time, but it was decent, strong, and it took higher power well so it became the standard. Its like usbC beating lightning. UsbC is basically a bad rip of lightning. Its sort of inside out lightning and does more or less the same thing, but is more complicated to make and harder to clean. But USBC is not proprietary, so It got iterated on and made faster, whereas lightning didn’t. So now lightning is worse and apple is annoyed because lightning arguably IS better. Lightning is gonna die though. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Search

Reply to thread