Interesting. Not sure if anyone posted yet. If so, sorry.
E-cigs: No smoke, but some areas are banning them - FoxNews.com
E-cigs: No smoke, but some areas are banning them - FoxNews.com
May be a dupe - Fox News - E-cigs: No smoke, but some areas are banning them
- Thread starter Krickster
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Good article. Fair and balanced reporting. Fox News earned it's name.
I find the part where the anti-smoking person states that there is a bigger problem when it "looks" just like a cigarette which can cause confusion. Another reason why the more our PV's do NOT look like cigarettes and the more we do NOT use the term "electronic cigarette", the better it will be for vaping in general.
I find the part where the anti-smoking person states that there is a bigger problem when it "looks" just like a cigarette which can cause confusion. Another reason why the more our PV's do NOT look like cigarettes and the more we do NOT use the term "electronic cigarette", the better it will be for vaping in general.
"They raise significant health concerns for us. We don't know what is in the vapor mist, we don't know what else is in the contents of that electronic cigarette," said Cynthia Hallett
I guess she's not paid enough to do a little research on the net to find out.
I guess she's not paid enough to do a little research on the net to find out.
That is a preposterous and unattainable level of safety to set, in that even breathing in a mouthful of 'fresh air' is not safe enough to "do no harm". The anti's are still moulding the rules to make them unachievable for vapers.
How about we outlaw vehicles, until they are proven to exhale non harmful gases. That is ridiculous!
Do no harm?
Really?
Okay, let's start a list of all the things that should not be allowed under that philosophy...
1) Automobiles
2) Twinkies
3) Cafe Mocha
4) Barbeques
5) Onion rings
6) Motorcycles
7) Peanuts
8) Everlasting Gobstoppers
9) Sugar, salt, and milk
I could go on, and on, and on, and.........
But that is all kind of irrelevant anyway I think.
I mean, electronic cigarettes DO NO HARM as far as I know.
Really?
Okay, let's start a list of all the things that should not be allowed under that philosophy...
1) Automobiles
2) Twinkies
3) Cafe Mocha
4) Barbeques
5) Onion rings
6) Motorcycles
7) Peanuts
8) Everlasting Gobstoppers
9) Sugar, salt, and milk
I could go on, and on, and on, and.........
But that is all kind of irrelevant anyway I think.
I mean, electronic cigarettes DO NO HARM as far as I know.
Last edited:
We see how well that philosophy works, considering the number one cause of preventable morbidity and mortality is.........the medical field.
Death by Medicine By Gary Null
Death by Medicine By Gary Null
It is all comparative isn't it. How long is a piece of string? How many apples does it make to make an apple pie? How safe is 'safe'? Nobody is ever going to achieve absolute safety in any product on any shelf in any store. They can achieve comparative safety though. Vaping is comparatively safe, compared to smoking. That is the only measure of acceptance anyone can possibly use.
Processed lunch meat has been proven to be cancerous via nitrates. Oscar Meyer is still in business as is Bores Head and Hillshire Farms. Hotdogs too...... Ballpark, Hebrew Int'l.... People are simply afraid of their own mortality.
Smoke, skydive, wrestle croc's... I wish people who try to impose rules/regulations on everyone else would just let people enjoy their life and go live theirs. I swear.
THIS JUST IN: -Everything- kills you... you are dying since the day you are born. Live and let live.
Read this thread if you want to be amazed (I'm being PC) at what a few on here think is required before we should ever vape within a 100 yards of another living entity.
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...-all-my-ecf-brothers-sisters-please-read.html
I disagree as well. It's a inhaler. It is ino different than asthematic using their inhaler with the exception of visable vapor.
http://www.zeecigs.com/PDF/Propylene-Glycol-Research-Study-Results.pdf
I have never really understood how can such a sharp contrast exist between Fox News TV and Fox News Online. The later actually fair and balanced for the most part. The first one, not so much.
Either way, great to see a decent story about e-cigs in a mayor news site.
Either way, great to see a decent story about e-cigs in a mayor news site.
- Status
