Misleading Journalism - ECF Infozone Article

[ECF Articles]

A new article has been posted on the ECF Infozone: The Huffington Post continues to show an interest in e-cigarettes, but.today’s article by Christopher Wanjek displays once again the logical and factual blemishes that have characterized journalism on the product for years. In brief, the article misleads by talking about dangers and toxicity with total disregard to exponential differences in levels of toxicity and danger. [...]
The post Misleading Journalism appeared first on ECF InfoZone. Article by Gary Cox


Go and read it Here...!

 

[mooreted]

I don't tend to think of the Huffington Post as a journalistic publication. It's really just a gossip rag.

 

[wv2win]

I don't tend to think of the Huffington Post as a journalistic publication. It's really just a gossip rag.

It's a propaganda rag with no interest in the truth. The National Enquirer has more credibility than the Huff Post.

 

[Orb Skewer]

One very telling thing about all these negative reports and articles is the distinct lack of 'victims'
Where is the body count ?
Victims of this 'harm' ?
Photos of people harmed by vaping, rushed into hospital, treated by medics etc etc
Personal accounts from maimed 'citizens' who've fallen fowl to this 'craze' ?

Statisticaly this has to be one of the safest recreational pleasures there is, no ?

 

[drtwain5]

While absence of evidence is not evidence for absence, published studies describe a significantly lower relative risk. While long term studies i.e., decades-long are lacking at this stage, there is a purulent, prejudiced and pernicious anti-ecig (anti-nic actually) movement which must be confronted with scientific evidence.