and this kind of Nazism /fascism is coming to us in the US
Yeahhh... I'm so confused... so is it for liq w nicotine or also for those with no nicotine?? Some more how come cna website put pic of several pvs if it's not a ban on pvs... jialat la. Super unclear !Exactly my thoughts. But they did mention it is the first phase of the ban. I'm just a little bit confused about the ambiguity of the terms, does it mean that liquids not containing any nicotine in them are legal? Sounds like there are quite a few grey areas.
Some more how come cna website put pic of several pvs if it's not a ban on pvs... jialat la. Super unclear !
Don't use politics lah haha. Even if WP Or whatever party they will still ban vape just to earn money. ESPECIALLY if it's WP. End of the day, it's the mindset of the Singapore's leadership as a whole.
yeah no political party going to fight for us...unless IPV or Cutt Wood make their own party here
I'm very worried about the impact that it would have on those yummy us flavours... =/and this kind of Nazism /fascism is coming to us in the US
We are f@$&ed.For those of you (especially newer members) who think that e-cigs/vaping will only be illegal after today, you are gravely mistaken.
There is no grey area regarding if it's only for nicotine/liquids or are PVs included. It is clear cut; vaporizers were banned a long time ago.
Section 16 of the Tobacco (Control of Advertisement and Sales) Act prohibits the import, distribution, sale or offer for sale of any article that is designed to resemble a tobacco product; this includes vaporisers such as e-cigarettes, e-pipes, e-cigars and the likes.
Any person who is convicted of an offence under section 16 is liable to a fine not exceeding $5,000 for a first offence and a fine not exceeding $10,000 for a second or subsequent offence and any e-cigarettes imported will be seized and confiscated.
Hardly make a difference to us though HAHA
My sentiments exactly... i see these media coverage more of a deterrence alarm for hipsters and underage kids then anything else.
Making it illegal only makes the black market more profitable and the counter effect of it all.. you cant even regulate .... if some choose to do silly things with PVs
Grey area/ ambiguous.. they will CONDEMN u with the law no matter what.. jus dun get caught with any PVs and e-liq
My take on this is.. cut the underage kids and hipsters away from our secret vape society and all other means of vaping and vape products and device, this matter should not be as hot as it is now.
Vape Safe
In an ideal world, vaping would be regulated and we could buy juice off 7-eleven or pharmacy shelves with producing an IC to verify age.
We are still decades away from that.
For those of you (especially newer members) who think that e-cigs/vaping will only be illegal after today, you are gravely mistaken.
There is no grey area regarding if it's only for nicotine/liquids or are PVs included. It is clear cut; vaporizers were banned a long time ago.
Section 16 of the Tobacco (Control of Advertisement and Sales) Act prohibits the import, distribution, sale or offer for sale of any article that is designed to resemble a tobacco product; this includes vaporisers such as e-cigarettes, e-pipes, e-cigars and the likes.
Any person who is convicted of an offence under section 16 is liable to a fine not exceeding $5,000 for a first offence and a fine not exceeding $10,000 for a second or subsequent offence and any e-cigarettes imported will be seized and confiscated.
5.
Any solution or substance, of which tobacco or nicotine is a constituent, that is intended to be used with an electronic nicotine delivery system or a vaporiser
(Electronic nicotine delivery system OR vaporiser. Quite clear)
such tobacco product, or class of tobacco products, as the Minister may by regulations prescribe, where the Minister is of the opinion that such product or class of products has or is capable of having the effect of encouraging or otherwise promoting smoking or other uses of tobacco products; or
(For those who want to play with loop hole in law. Don't. They already have covered their bases. "where the Minister is of the opinion that such product or class of products has or is capable of having the effect of encouraging or otherwise promoting smoking or other uses of tobacco product. You can argue until the cow comes home but at the end of the day, the government will just throw you one sentence. "It encourages youth to take up smoking" Although it is false, you will lose. Individual resources vs government)