the graph you posted.
now that i charge to 4.1 i see longer run time
with the 30q.
the graph doesn't explain that.
in fact, it makes no
sense.
i didn't notice a difference when i charged fully.
thanks for the site.
i thot blog meant something different from ecf.
I do not see how partial charging can improve run time. It may improve longevity which is the life of the battery over a long duration.
Mooch’s graph does not show run time with partial charges.
It displays voltage sag based on the current (amps) that is being drawn. And the discharge rate of that current draw.
Battery voltage is on the y Axis (left) and AmpHours (which is milliamp hours x 1000) are along the x Axis (bottom)
From the Samsung 35E graph I posted, look at the 5 amp plot (red).
Mooch started this measurement at 4.2 volts. But as soon as a 5 amp discharge begins, voltage immediately drops to roughly 3.8 volts. This is referred to as the voltage sag (I called it voltage drop earlier, same thing). Voltage Sag is a result of the
batteries internal DC resistance and the amount of current being drawn. In this case lets assume it equals -0.4 volts voltage sag for a 5 amp draw.
Now follow the 5 amp plot to where 3.2 volts crosses it. You now have a AmpHrs measurement. Which in this case is roughly 1.925 AmpHrs or 1925 mAh.
Everything to the right of my big arrow is unused energy. We can not utilize that energy because the device does not allow it. It cuts off at 3.2 volts.
The 30Q measurement was not taken with a 5amp draw. The 10 amp draw equals roughly 2.1 AmpHrs (or 2100 mAh). Given discharge rates reduce when current draw also reduces, then it is safe to say the 30Q would enjoy a much higher run time at 5 amps thus give better performance than the 35E.
If both batteries where discharged at <1amp and down to 2.5 volts, their AmpHrs would more closely represent their mAh rating. BUT we do not vape down to 2.5 volts, so we HAVE to account for our device cut off.
Excuse my poor graphic editing.