I tried a lot of coils, dual, single, sub-ohm, 1.3 Ohms etc. in the last few weeks using 28ga and 2mm, 2.4mm and 1.5mm coil diameter.
Ironically, the best result with my Kayfun Lite V2 is with a standard micro (?) coil, about 8ish wraps at 1.3 Ohms AND a "normal" but picture perfect wick, using organic cotton.
(When I say "normal" wicking method I mean using the recommended 45 deg. "Z" shape of my coil/wick, with this little offset to the side, then on top and on bottom of the "Z" the wick is going down straight to the deck, barely touching the deck (on the side of the channels). The channels are mostly free with the wick at the side or only a very tiny part of the wick reaching into the channels.
Today I tried a Navy nest on the same coil but I am not impressed respective I don't see a difference. (Whether the flavor is muted with the Navy Nest I can't 100% say. It's POSSIBLE when I assume that with the Navy nest the channels are more covered while with the normal "Z" wick the channels were more open.
I am speculating (and claiming here) that a "fancy" wick like the Navy nest would only show an advantage when you're sub-ohming, but for normal single coils 1.3++Ohms that a normal "Z" wick is entirely suitable, if not better. (I probably couldn't tell a difference right now, maybe the difference I think to see right now is placebo....or simply "fresh" wick vs. old one)
Edit: I am aware that a generalization of "what wicking method is best" is nonsense. I did a normal wick again after the Nest and I *think* the flavor w/ the normal wick is better, but then I also always have to be more careful there w/ dry hits. (A tiny difference in wicking etc. can make all the difference). The "best" wick IMHO really depends on the device, the depth of the juice channels etc. I can see that with my EHPRO and tiny juice channels, having the channels all the way clear may have a benefit for better juice flow, therefore better flavor. With a device like The Russian 91 which has deeper juice channels it might look totally different again, there it might not matter if strands are wrapped above the channels since the channels can supply more juice out of the box anyway. Just my $0.01. It's always a trial & error thing to find what works best.
Ironically, the best result with my Kayfun Lite V2 is with a standard micro (?) coil, about 8ish wraps at 1.3 Ohms AND a "normal" but picture perfect wick, using organic cotton.
(When I say "normal" wicking method I mean using the recommended 45 deg. "Z" shape of my coil/wick, with this little offset to the side, then on top and on bottom of the "Z" the wick is going down straight to the deck, barely touching the deck (on the side of the channels). The channels are mostly free with the wick at the side or only a very tiny part of the wick reaching into the channels.
Today I tried a Navy nest on the same coil but I am not impressed respective I don't see a difference. (Whether the flavor is muted with the Navy Nest I can't 100% say. It's POSSIBLE when I assume that with the Navy nest the channels are more covered while with the normal "Z" wick the channels were more open.
I am speculating (and claiming here) that a "fancy" wick like the Navy nest would only show an advantage when you're sub-ohming, but for normal single coils 1.3++Ohms that a normal "Z" wick is entirely suitable, if not better. (I probably couldn't tell a difference right now, maybe the difference I think to see right now is placebo....or simply "fresh" wick vs. old one)
Edit: I am aware that a generalization of "what wicking method is best" is nonsense. I did a normal wick again after the Nest and I *think* the flavor w/ the normal wick is better, but then I also always have to be more careful there w/ dry hits. (A tiny difference in wicking etc. can make all the difference). The "best" wick IMHO really depends on the device, the depth of the juice channels etc. I can see that with my EHPRO and tiny juice channels, having the channels all the way clear may have a benefit for better juice flow, therefore better flavor. With a device like The Russian 91 which has deeper juice channels it might look totally different again, there it might not matter if strands are wrapped above the channels since the channels can supply more juice out of the box anyway. Just my $0.01. It's always a trial & error thing to find what works best.
Last edited: