Discuss? Well, it was a nicely written article and while I do agree with Eskie that the main problem is lack of willingness to take note of such studies, even the most stubborn lemmings may eventually give up the fight and hurl themselves off the "
harm reduction" cliff (finding it a shorter journey than they thought) so in my eyes, for some people, it takes reading something fifty times for it to sink in (I do not exempt myself from this process at times).
So, as far as I'm concerned, the more studies/articles like this, the better. If someone wants to bury their head in the sand and ignore science because they have a "movement" I say let them stay with the giant sand spiders and hopefully have their "movement" far, far away from me....
It was a very nicely written article and hard to refute, if read. With that said, I do also think the rabid anti-movement will often read these articles with the SOLE purpose of finding a way to discredit/distort them, and that lot are NOT stupid, but they are evil.
If only life were more fact based, not so much emotion based.... You may never convince
some people whose loved ones may have died of
tobacco related illnesses that anything with the word "cigarette" even if prefaced by "E" will be anything other than Satan Personified.
(I actually can't believe that I just typed the above, LOL, for one, I like emotions, and for two, I do have
some sympathy for those folks but they need to grow up and accept that Life Hurts.)
Anna