My apologies if I came off a bit harsh - certainly no slight intended. I wrote that at 5am this morning after a long evening of mixing, chatting, trolling the forums (yes, I do it too... guilty as charged)... and then that popped up and I was in "what now" mode. It's really born more out of frustration with the rules and process than it is with anything you said or did so don't take it as a personal jab or anything like that. Put yourself in my position - if I were able to post about you in a public forum but you had no way to respond to an inquiry, you would probably be a little frustrated. Mind you, that's not a shot at ECF or the moderators - if you look deep into my history you will see that I have been nothing short of supportive of the rules that are in place to ensure a level playing field in the highest traffic forums. All that said, it's frustrating as hell watching a bunch of conjecture unfold when, if I was allowed, I could have simply answered the question. I didn't lose any sleep over it, I hope you didn't either. You see where I am coming from though...
I think the portion of the wording you have taken up issue with is the "whole" portion of WTA. Whole implies, to some people, that at some point in the process there is a super concentrated vial of nothing but tobacco alkaloids. That's definitely not part of my process, nor will it ever be... honestly, I think it's kind of redundant... why go to the time and trouble of making a super-concentrated WTA solution and then proceed to dilute it? You get the idea... Mind you, I'm not knocking the process, and if consumers are willing to pay a premium price for it, I applaud the vendors and their respective wholesale partners (because most outsource the WTA component) for contributing to innovation and progress in the community at large. I've tried the end products also - products that contain Vapelicious and/or Aroma. Aroma, specifically, is breaking new ground and I can say with little hesitation that that are a wonderful company that anyone should consider trying - especially if they find "regular eliquid" to be unsatisfying enough to keep them off the alternative. Speaking of which - maybe you know the answer to this @Randy C - what's the deal with two different Vapelicious websites? Ie, vapelicious.com and ............. ? I don't get it.
Never thought you were a "bad guy" - hard to dislike a Garth Brooks fan.
Cheers,
Clark