Linux primary audience today is commercial applications - servers and stuff - we are left more to the wolves in the normal consumer market... We have a couple of Linux users in our group - I am sure they will jump in with more info...
Exactly.
If Linux had had wider adoption, therefore more users, before now, developers would have written more & better "consumer" programs for it sooner, and also more versions of Windows programs now in popular use would have been ported over to Linux sooner... which would have led to even more users, which would have led to even more support - on and on, so forth.
Gates made what will probably go down as the single-most smartest business decision in human history when he *licensed* BASIC & MS-DOS to IBM instead of selling it to them outright. Oh BTW - he also started his journey to 'richest man on earth' by plagiarizing BASIC from some other language (can't recall right now), and later plagiarized part-or-most of CP/M to make MS-DOS 1.0.
(The above paragraph is strictly from my memory of 30+ years ago, and my memory isn't what it used to be. I haven't read anything of Gates' history or beginnings in... well, 30+ years. Feel free to correct me on anything I might have misconstrued.)
I used Linux for a year or so. It is really meant for people who are more computer-sophisticated than myself. Took a while before I had the software I needed, and learned how to use it. Then, when I transited back to windows, I had to re-learn what I had forgotten. It was fun, and really ideal for elderly computers because it can be so lightweight.
It wouldn't be only for computer-sophisticated people - if it were more widely used and supported, and had had more user-friendly front-ends developed sooner. Also, MS wouldn't have a death-grip on the consumer/business market, viruses wouldn't be as pervasive and potentially damaging, and open-source applications would rule.
I think ECF just burped - it kicked me out for a moment after my post...
Probably 'cause it's a Windows-based BBS... derp!