I just realized this is a Reo thread and in my first post here i mentioned using the Aero on another bottom feeder... wouldn't have done that.
That said, I can easily substitute my Reo Grand topped with an Aero, as I am doing so, and will say that both the HH357 LR 1.5 and the Aero (1.5 only) are a "cooler" 1.5 LR. Trying to compare a Cisco 306 LR 1.5 with these is not fair imo, since the latter is famous for its wham factor; too hot for some.
The Aero at 1.5 is just right imo for a 3.7 mod ... so is the HH357 LR 1.5 because they aren't really on the hot hot side.
Thanks Wil, for proving what I suspected; the Aero is Cisco's version of Hanna's creation.
He must have left something out because while the Aero is my second favorite, it doesn't quite come up to HH357 value in the flavor dept.
Yet, second to HH357 is big imo because there is such a gap compared to anything else. Nothing is as good as a HH357 in flavor... vapor is great too.
Airy? yep, but worth the discomfort if you don't like airy.
I use the Aero's on my 3.7 b/f's.
At $12 the Aero is expensive yes, but better than a 5, 6, 8, 9 dollar atomizer? Yes. The flavor is better imo.
It's a solidly smooth vaporful atty.
I am the atty killer excuse me, but I'm learning. After close to 2 years of going through mostly DSE 901's (Vapor Kings 10pak $37.) - one atty a week, times at least 3 devices, I try to keep them from any dry hits, yet attempting always not to overfeed.
The key to "best vape" on both the HH357 and the Aero, for me, is not overfeeding. Keeping them alive is best acheived by minimizing dry hits, so it's a balancing game. I vodka bathe them all once a week, and only blow through the connector.
At half the price of Hanna's ultimate atty's i think it a deal, and since they are true 1.5 Ohm, you don't need an expensive VV device. These atty's work fabulous on any 3.7 device.
Ok, I went straight to the Cisco's mouth on this one... Below, a support ticket I opened and the response I received...
There has been much discussion lately on an ECF Forum thread debating the differences between these two atomizers, both in the 306 and 510 versions.
Having used both, I'm not certain one is better or significantly different than the other. It's entirely possible that I'm not sensitive enough to pick it up. Is the Aero perhaps a slightly more airy draw?
Would it be possible to get a description of the difference (without divulging any trade secrets)? Other than that nifty etching on the Aero?
Thanks much!
Wil Sutton
Date: 23-Mar-2012 17:39:26
Name: Jessica
Message:
The air flow on aero's is tuned to increase the flavor. They are slightly more airy than our bridged/bridge-less 306's. The aero's need the increased air flow to generate a vacuum effect which increases the amount of liquid to the coil. Slow and or soft drags will not produce much of a different between the two. There is more of a noticeable different on the 510's more so than the 306's. We might stop making the 306 aero and stick with 510's only.
-C