Log in
Register
Welcome to the world's largest e-cigarette website.
The voice of vaping since 2007
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Welcome to the world's largest e-cigarette website.
The voice of vaping since 2007
Forums
Forum list
New posts
Search forums
Leaderboards
Products
Search reviews
Brands-Connect
Latest content
Vaping.com
Disposable Vapes
Vape Juice
Vape Kits
Vape Pods
Vape Coils
Star Suppliers
Media
New media
Search media
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
E-Cigarette Community
New Members: Introduce Yourself!
Picture of Your Setup Part 3!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sofarsogood" data-source="post: 19388997" data-attributes="member: 229304"><p>Here is the problem with a 40 cents per ml tax using my situation as an example. I vape 5 ml DIY per day x 365 days = 1825 ml per year x 1.1 cents per ml = $20.07. Anybody can make liquid for my cost of ingredients. Now add the tax. 40 cents x 1825 ml = $730.00. What happens when you put a $730 tax on $20 worth of a product so easy to make and that's in demand? The governor is not that stupid. It's in his budget proposal as a bargaining chip. And this is the problem with any e liquid tax. Either the retailers absorb the cost so liquid prices stay the same (no deterrance for kids) or the tax is ridiculously high and there is a black market. This is why the only solution to the tobacco excise tax problem is to protect cigarettes by banning vaping which is exactly what the FDA is attempting to do. </p><p></p><p>Stealth is my style these days.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]645457[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sofarsogood, post: 19388997, member: 229304"] Here is the problem with a 40 cents per ml tax using my situation as an example. I vape 5 ml DIY per day x 365 days = 1825 ml per year x 1.1 cents per ml = $20.07. Anybody can make liquid for my cost of ingredients. Now add the tax. 40 cents x 1825 ml = $730.00. What happens when you put a $730 tax on $20 worth of a product so easy to make and that's in demand? The governor is not that stupid. It's in his budget proposal as a bargaining chip. And this is the problem with any e liquid tax. Either the retailers absorb the cost so liquid prices stay the same (no deterrance for kids) or the tax is ridiculously high and there is a black market. This is why the only solution to the tobacco excise tax problem is to protect cigarettes by banning vaping which is exactly what the FDA is attempting to do. Stealth is my style these days. [ATTACH=full]645457[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
E-Cigarette Community
New Members: Introduce Yourself!
Picture of Your Setup Part 3!
Top
Bottom
Forums
Products
Vaping.com
Star Suppliers
Blogs
Menu
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…