For the record, I don't have a problem with X-Drifter using the term "Ohmage"... He wasn't trying to imply that that it was a correct term. I know for a fact that he knows the correct terminology. He was being funny and he used in a part of the forum where the people reading it know the correct terminology.
My problem is with the people who hang out in the new members forum and feed garbage to beginners, who in turn, perpetuate incorrect terminology because they simply don't know any better.
I never said an atomizer didn't deliver anything. Reread my post. I clearly stated that it delivers vapor.Ok, smart guy I will play your game, as per Merriam-Webster dictionary:
Delivery - the act or manner of delivering something; also : something delivered
"Juice" is pretty clearly defined... Guess you need to be a "smart guy" to work that out...
My apologies for omitting the bottle as a delivery device. I stand corrected. If you choose to drink it straight from the bottle, knock yourself out...You could drink your juice for your fix but instead you choose to vape it utilizing an Atomizer to deliver the juices for you in a vapor form. I will show you the deliveries to get it from your bottle to your lungs, follow along now.
The bottle delivers it to your device( whither a dripper or genny or clearo or whatever), which in turn delivers it to your choice of wick, which in turn delivers it up to the coil, which changes it from liquid to a vapor and delivers it to your mouth which delivers it to your lungs through your esophagus.
"Atty" has been an accepted and recognized synonym for atomizer for as long as I've been vaping. My use of it, in no way, invalidates any of my previous statements.Just saying and by the way using ATTY and then griping about the terminology that someone else using isn't the CORRECT term completely invalidates your point
^^ Jas, on our squeeze boxes, the bottle, when squozen, actually does deliver the juice (via a tube) to the atomizer.
LOL... Agreed. I admit that omitting the bottle (and squonk straw) in my list of juice delivery devices was an error on my part. I still, however, contend that neither the atomizer, as a whole nor the coil by itself, are "juice delivery devices"... They deliver vapor... Oh, and pretty please don't start calling atomizers "Vapor Delivery Devices" either...![]()
There is... It's "atomizer".![]()
I know, but atomizer has been used so long to refer to disposable atties like 510s and 901s. Ask someone what atomizer they use, they'll often say the use cartos, clearos, etc and not atties. I've also tried asking what topper someone uses, which also confuses lol. However, "what juice deliver system do you use" is usually understood. In the Natural Tobacco thread I frequent, we've shortened it to JDS, since what JDS a person uses is pretty important with extracted tobaccos and is a term used fairly often.
Sent from my LGL55C using Tapatalk 2
^ Hence the term "heaters"
Heaters loaded with micros. I like it.
I like the term "heater". I like it better than "atomizer" actually. It's provides a far better description of what the item does IMO.
Just think... I year from now, some ... hole, just like me, is going to go on a rant telling people that is not a "resistance induced fluid state transformer"... It's a "juice delivery device"!
This semantics debate is getting interesting. I am by no means an expert in all of the myriad of configurations for AV stuff, but I am working towards that. Anyhow, I have understood an "atomizer" to be that which contains the coil, and thus, the main heating component of a JDS. I think "heater" is nice name for it, but I always think of Randy Jackson firing a fastball when I hear the word "heater". LOL
First time I heard it referred to as a "heater" was watching Petar K videos.
"Topper"... Not a chance. I've had enough gay friends to know what what they mean when they use that term. My tube mods will NEVER have a "topper" screwed into them... That is my line and I'm not crossing it. LOL