I have an MN lawmaker as a regular customer, showed him this post, and all he said was "If most people did this, I doubt vaping would come up in our legislation in such a bad manner as it has." I would poke so far as to say that, yes, that statement from a lawmaker does prove, at least in this guys case, that how we treat them DOES effect how lawmakers look at us.
It seems many of you are a little irked that I am treating this as Vaping = Smoking. Im not. At all. I vape like no other in walmart, but I also don't do it at high noon while the store is packed. I get pretty ballsy with where I vape sometimes, but things like restaurants where people are eating and places with high concentrations of children are just not cool with me personally. I've lost my appetite because of other vapers in perkins before, and that SUCKS to be nicked by one of your own brethren.
I'll rewrite the whole thing in first person if you really truly want, but it won't change much of anything. I write in second person all the time for the simple fact that it's easy to write like I am talking to myself or someone else. I'm not attempting to tell you what to do, it just tends to be easier for myself to write and others to understand like that. Apparently, it also has the added perk of starting one helluva interesting flame war. The internet would be SO BORING if people didn't get upset with other people's views.
I'm thinking this is the last time I pipe up on this thread. Mod's, close 'er down if you like. I said my bit, got my little rant off my chest, and even found a couple in agreement. I thank you ALL for everything you've put in to it, and I even would personally like to think @Jman08 and @wv2win for the interesting time. Maybe you guys can PM me or vice versa and we can work out our view differences there. Peace all, I'll be in other sections