RX200S amp reading/cutoff

Status
Not open for further replies.

ddirtyvapes

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 23, 2011
1,183
1,563
Portland, ME
@seek2 I think you might be missing the point, which is that the chart is still relevant within the parameters of the RX devices. The chart itself stretches below the minimum resistance the RX is capable of firing because it is showing the full, possible range based purely on ohm's law calculations. If the RX were capable of firing sub .1 builds, you could bring a .080ohm up to 200W, which is exactly what the chart, and I believe Bill, are saying. Because the RX won't fire below .1, that's the default minimum resistance... but it doesn't make the chart information wrong. It just means the mod itself can't fire below 0.1ohms. If the "minimum resistance" for a given power rating on the chart is below what the RX can fire, it simply means you can take that .1ohm all the way up.

But that's all I have to say on the matter.
 

seek2

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
May 25, 2014
130
102
Chicago, IL
I never once said the chart was wrong. I said it not relevant to the rx200 and the question.

Of course if the coils are in range the chart applies. But it shows nothing.

No. You do not understand regulated mods, the rx200 and 200s are the same chip. So even asking that question is lacking, and the reply was incorrect. A dna200/133 chart. I replied to this thread because there is nothing that chart that gives an ounce of info.

We got one guy eating popcorn. Another guy asking if if he buys the same device will it change his voltage to .3 because his other mod has an amp reading feature and did the same. "(pssst...same chip dude with an S for screen, they changed the display and added a few colors is all), and another guy posting a dna133 sled chart in an rx200s thread. Lol, ugh.
 

ddirtyvapes

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 23, 2011
1,183
1,563
Portland, ME
You are backpedaling.

It's okay that you misunderstood, and it's okay not to know things.

Be well.

I can't really deal with negative and unfriendly, so I'm taking advantage of the site's ignore feature. Apologies if any of my subsequent responses don't make sense with ignored content, but really I got my answer (50A and a helpful and entirely relevant chart, despite what some think) so I don't see why I'd have to post anymore in here.

Thanks to those who were, you know, actually helpful.

@sawlight cheers!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread