For some reason, I doubt it. Seems to me you are a whole lot of hot air without and real wind behind it
Thank you Julie!
-
Need help from former MFS (MyFreedomSmokes) customers
Has any found a supplier or company that has tobacco e-juice like or very similar to MFS Turbosmog, Tall Paul, or Red Luck?
View thread
SE, NJoy vs FDA -- Discussion
- Thread starter rolygate
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
For some reason, I doubt it. Seems to me you are a whole lot of hot air without and real wind behind it
Thank you Julie!
I'll just point out Sherid's thread about the anti "bible" and how they are basically ordered to go in a disrupt the online communities of the opposition.
I see no point in joining a community, criticizing their actions/beliefs and then refusing to help. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. There are two lawyers and a doctor on the CASAA board donating their time/expertise and Bill Godshall (who I think was/is also an attorney) who DOESN'T EVEN vape and he donates time/expertise as a CASAA advisor and to other vaping groups, as well. Not to mention Julie's expertise! We have no use for some cocky lawyer who thinks he knows what's best for us and keeps arms length from the community.
Maybe BS (Big Sheepherder) is just an ambulance chaser looking to get paid for his "expertise?" Or looking to create doubt and dampen spirits? Either way, completely useless to this community, with all of the game-playing.
If you're not with us, you're against us, in my opinion. Personally, I don't need any more "BS" in my life. I get plenty of that from the antis.
I see no point in joining a community, criticizing their actions/beliefs and then refusing to help. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. There are two lawyers and a doctor on the CASAA board donating their time/expertise and Bill Godshall (who I think was/is also an attorney) who DOESN'T EVEN vape and he donates time/expertise as a CASAA advisor and to other vaping groups, as well. Not to mention Julie's expertise! We have no use for some cocky lawyer who thinks he knows what's best for us and keeps arms length from the community.
Maybe BS (Big Sheepherder) is just an ambulance chaser looking to get paid for his "expertise?" Or looking to create doubt and dampen spirits? Either way, completely useless to this community, with all of the game-playing.
If you're not with us, you're against us, in my opinion. Personally, I don't need any more "BS" in my life. I get plenty of that from the antis.
Last edited:
Oh, and thank you Julie! I won't be OT on this thread anymore. (Nothing of interest here folks, move along and let the people who care get back to WORK! LOL!)
No worries, Kristin . . . personally, it doesn't bother me at all if folks want to have discussions on this thread that meander a bit. If it gets too messy, the janitor will come in and clean things up.
And, like I said, I know how to SHOUT if I have something important to say.
I'm through debating too, Julie, that's not the purpose of this thread. It's back to the docket watch for me and I mean it this time. 
Actually, if you look at the title, this is the "discussion" thread. This one: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...174-se-njoy-vs-fda-court-dockets-updates.html is the docket thread, though it looks like the mods-in-charge have been a little lax
Very true, CJ, but despite the name, this one has been used for the docket updates, so we might as well go along with the flow.
I'm thinking more along the lines of a paralegal student researching this forum for a paper that's due, and other than possibly giving it a try for their research, probably not a vaper either. Far too much textbook regurgitation.
Last edited:
Seriously, guys . . . it's not a problem with me if people want to have discussions on a discussion thread.
I haven't had much to say because I lost interest in Sheepherder's posts pretty quickly. Personally, I think he's a pretty effective troll, and I doubt he's a lawyer.
I haven't had much to say because I lost interest in Sheepherder's posts pretty quickly. Personally, I think he's a pretty effective troll, and I doubt he's a lawyer.
It was fun, Julie, but it's over now, at least for me. If his intention was to demoralize us and/or to disrupt the thread, he didn't succeed. If we can survive PhiHalcyon, we can survive anything.
@ CJ
@ CJ
Last edited:
Do you folks really think that petty, ill-considered remarks will prompt me to disclose my CV to YOU? What a joke! Now it's simply too bad that I don't agree with all of you on everything, but even all of you don't agree among yourselves on everything. Truly pathetic is that some of you cannot fathom the most obvious positions that definitely will be taken successfully against your interests in the near future, even after trotted out fairly clearly to you. If you're unhappy with some of the prospects I outlined, go pay someone to do a complete analysis for thousands of dollars, then you can come back here and feel and talk crap ad nauseum after they tell you the same thing. Most of what I have outlined for you really is not up for debate, but appears some of you will have to pay someone to draw pictures for you to understand it. Sheesh!
Last edited:
Does anybody have any extra hot air they can lend, I think someone is in need
Odd... this doesn't even sound like the BS we've grown to love and cherish. The whole tone and style is atypical of previous posts.
Maybe it forgot which user name it was commenting as. This happened several times in it's thread about ugly mods.
Maybe it's bi-troller.
But I digress.
Last edited:
Okay, I missed the start of this little sidetrack on reality and I stayed up way too late on such foolishness. However, this country boy needs to make a few observations.
BS, you don't mind initials I hope, BS, as brilliant and well read as you appear to be, how on earth did you ever get hooked on cigarettes in the first place? Shame on you! They are the drugs of the uneducated.
Obviously you have a very prominent position that you wish to keep secretive thus not exposing any hint of you CV. However you must be pretty important cause most of us common folks would call it our job history or resume. The thing that I can't wrap my thoughts around is how you're posting so incessantly from mid-day to late at night.
Finally, since some have felt your approach to communication has been somewhat lacking in getting your point across here, have you considered adding the word "babe" to your sentences?
Just some thoughts before is honker down for the night.
BS, you don't mind initials I hope, BS, as brilliant and well read as you appear to be, how on earth did you ever get hooked on cigarettes in the first place? Shame on you! They are the drugs of the uneducated.
Obviously you have a very prominent position that you wish to keep secretive thus not exposing any hint of you CV. However you must be pretty important cause most of us common folks would call it our job history or resume. The thing that I can't wrap my thoughts around is how you're posting so incessantly from mid-day to late at night.
Finally, since some have felt your approach to communication has been somewhat lacking in getting your point across here, have you considered adding the word "babe" to your sentences?
Just some thoughts before is honker down for the night.
I thought this was a brilliant suggestion--experimented with tacking "babe" onto some of the BS ideas and it really did make them clearer more appealing. Thanks for making me burst out laughing first thing in the morning!
A worthy comment but one with which I disagree. You seem to be suggesting that our friend is in fact the irritating legal Brit who commonly uses that device in a dismissive manner, when addressing those who are actually doing something about the current issues. I feel that he is not the same person but a close cousin: an irritating legal Yank. Therefore I think it more likely he would add 'dude' to the end of his sentence. Sentence in the singular, as there normally seems to be only the one.
A debate involving our two friends would thus be dense legalese, with no constructive elements of any kind, interspersed with frequent 'babes' and 'dudes'. Surely a proposition attractive to all?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
