Jman, I may not agree with the your posted benefits but you have the right to believe it.
Need help from former MFS (MyFreedomSmokes) customers
Has any found a supplier or company that has tobacco e-juice like or very similar to MFS Turbosmog, Tall Paul, or Red Luck?
Not speculation. Its the rules of the tobacco Control Act which eCigarettes will be part of. You are going off of opinion. I'm stating fact. Have you even bothered reading any of the proposed law? Or just the edited ANTZ version?
Useful to me would be that fellow vapers some hating on BT and vocalize that if vaping is banned they will be forced to go back to smoking and subject to imminent death from the regulators / murderers. If just a few have thought twice about such rhetoric, especially those that write up CTA's, then I think this has been a useful discussion.
But in the event that a vaper does feel need to vocalize such things, I may again feel need to enter into such a discussion to note how utterly useless it is to make such immature statements and the political ramifications they carry with them.
Not law yet but it's exactly what you are promoting.Proposed. Not yet law, undecided
As I've noted before, all a company (or 20) has to do is advertise as "non-BT vapes" and they'd be making billions their first year and possibly trillions by year 10. Because of how utterly lucrative this could forever be, there would be no incentive to sell out to BT. Arguably they could make more money than BT combined.
OK, on this specific topic, you don't agree with the causal connection that:
banning vaping -> people smoking -> death
Because you don't agree that people will start smoking again if vaping is banned, and you don't agree that smoking causes health issues that lead to death. Both of these positions are "religious," in the sense that ultimately you believe what you believe, and no one can convince you differently, because any evidence that contradicts these beliefs is obviously faulty (it must be, because it disagrees with your beliefs). The same is true for me. Without changing these assumptions, the conclusion can never change, and there is no way to change these assumptions. So, the discussion is essentially pointless, and will only lead to more argument.
Ultimately, we both have strong rationalizations for our respective beliefs based on our addictive processes. Believing that there is no relationship between banning vaping and people smoking helps to reinforce your addictive process, while believing the opposite is true for where I am in the addictive process. Same with the relationship between smoking and death. So, as addicts, we will never agree on this.

I take it you have never held a license to resell issued by the ATF. The rules and regs are very detailed and strictly enforced. You can be fined, lose your business license, and even imprisoned for activities beyond your control. Currently the states are using genuine photo ID machines to create 'fake' ID'S for those underage and punishing anyone who sells to them. (How can it be fake if it is real???)Pipe tobacco, tubes and rolling machines aren't illegal; neither is SYO cigarettes. Now, if someone sells SYO packs, yes it is a black market activity, but their business exists simply because others are too lazy to stuff their own, not because pipe tobacco, tubes and rolling machines are illegal...
Proposed. Not yet law, undecided
Not law yet but it's exactly what you are promoting.
i for one am a vaper and not an addict in the legal or medical
definition of the term.
regards
mike
I take it you have never held a license to resell issued by the ATF. The rules and regs are very detailed and strictly enforced. You can be fined, lose your business license, and even imprisoned for activities beyond your control. Currently the states are using genuine photo ID machines to create 'fake' ID'S for those underage and punishing anyone who sells to them. (How can it be fake if it is real???)
In many ways the black market is better...
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Pretty much. Vaping hasn't been added yet but it's on its way. This is not a law to make anything safer. This is only a law that makes companies disclose their ingredients while paying a massive fee that only a giant corporation can afford.Correct Me if I'm Wrong.
But Isn't this a Current Law?
Overview of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act: Consumer Fact Sheet
It only needs an Agency to Implement and Enforce the Law.
Enter the FDA Stage Left.
If I'm not able to obtain a nicotine base for DIY, I'll be back smoking cigarettes the moment my last drop of liquid is gone.I'm glad for you. Really. You'll have no problem quitting if vaping is banned. I, on the other hand, am an addict and will likely have problems.
Yes.Don't you think something should be done to prevent obesity in our society.
If I'm not able to obtain a nicotine base for DIY, I'll be back smoking cigarettes the moment my last drop of liquid is gone.
I'm glad for you. Really. You'll have no problem quitting if vaping is banned. I, on the other hand, am an addict and will likely have problems.
i for one am a vaper and not an addict in the legal or medical
definition of the term.
regards
mike
Pretty much. Vaping hasn't been added yet but it's on its way. This is not a law to make anything safer. This is only a law that makes companies disclose their ingredients while paying a massive fee that only a giant corporation can afford.
Denial is one of the symptoms
If I'm not able to obtain a nicotine base for DIY, I'll be back smoking cigarettes the moment my last drop of liquid is gone.
If I'm not able to obtain a nicotine base for DIY, I'll be back smoking cigarettes the moment my last drop of liquid is gone.