Sig pistol owners chime in

Status
Not open for further replies.

mezzio

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
I'm going out today to find a new home defense pistol, and as of now i have the Sig P226 and Sig P229 in my sights. I want it in .40s&w, but .357 might suffice, as one of the pistols I looked at was a .357. Ive shot the p226 several times before and like the balance, but the p229 is ever so slightly smaller. Anyone have any input on this totally awesome display of bang bang power?

the p220 may also be a contender since when it all comes down to it, I want a .45, but would rather have it in a 1911 style (Kimber TLEII anyone?!? :D)


for the record, i HATE HATE HATE composite frames, so glocks, h&k's and the sig 250 and 2022 are out. dont suggest them, because ill just ignore it :2cool:
 

Arkady

Full Member
Dec 7, 2009
6
0
SC
I hear you on polymer frames--I've sold every one I've ever owned.

As for Sig, I'm a huge fan. My carry gun is a P228 which I've put over 10,000 rounds through. I've also owned P226s and P220s, but went back to the 228 (which is the same size as the 229, but 9mm only) due to its smaller, more tote-able size.

There have been some quality control issues with Sig pistols since around 2004. This is not to say that none of them work, but you are more likely to encounter problems in pistols from 2004 to 2009.

One thing to consider is getting a railed model for attaching a light. There are several schools of thought on this, with some people saying that mounting a light directly to the weapon is a bad idea (it provides a convenient aiming point for your attacker), but unless you are willing to train to the point that I have, I think that having a combined package is a great idea--never underestimate the ability to identify your target in a dark environment. Look at something like the Streamlight TLR-1.
 

mezzio

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
i bought a p229, i posted pix up in the firearms thread. its an early 94 build year, shoots as straight as i can make it presently, and feels perfect (great balance), no rail, accessories are pointless to me. The only thing i want to get done is some trigger work, i dont like how much pull i have before it actually fires, im gonna start looking for a competition trigger with a shorter pull.

as far as beginning pistols, 9mm is always a good starter... however, as i and just about any other shooter learns eventually, contrary to popular belief, larger caliber ammo does help in reducing recoil because of of the weight. i personally dont like composite frames (glocks, springfield xd's etc... anything with a plastic frame), but thats personal preference, some people love them. best advice id say is find a range with some good instructors, and a range of "rental" pistols that you can try out. youll get a little instruction and a chance to try out a few different guns to see which fits you best.
 

TexasRain104

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2010
186
1
The State of Texas, USA
Used to carry the p226rdak on duty. Awsome piece! The 40 was perfect, but i also had the 357 barrel change out. Never could qualify over a 80% with the 357 (damn round was too hot for me) and 85% with the 40. Had plroblems with the grip on a double stack so went to a single stack Kimber 1911 45 tle/lr II. shot 94% out of the box. Sig is a better weapon for all weather. 1911 is a better shot IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread