I'm boring enough that the gubm'nt rep listening to my calls is gonna get a nice nap
(yes, it's very disturbing)
(yes, it's very disturbing)
These findings also suggest that composite statistics across cohorts, such as allele frequency or genotype counts, do not mask identity within genome-wide association studies.
they're not listening unless the connections are "suspect"... but i bet they start listening then. They may have to get another warrant, but i wouldn't be at all surprised if the branch of the judiciary overseeing this kind of stuff gives out warrants pretty easily
I agree Haze. I think they try to say that it's not an invasion, since they look at the data in aggregate, not by individual. BUT, considering that it was pretty easy to reconstruct individual data about supposedly anonymous DNA info that is available to some researchers, i don't really buy that argument.
Are you sure about that CES? The Homeland Security Act is wildly broad ... I'm not sure they have to obtain anything to listen to calls they deem suspect as a result.
I was being optimistic....
NGA...I agree. In particular with concerns over PRIVATE companies having so much information. I think it's...even worse...than government. The government, police and courts are trusted entities setup by society. I know people don't trust them, and the USA has a rather noble history of distrust in that regard. However, they can be held accountable and can even do some good with the information. It's a sacred trust. Probably abused, of course. I'm not fond of it either. However, we may very well need it. IDK how many lives have been saved already. And there's no proof yet that it is leading to BAD results. It should be monitored.
Private companies...OTOH...should NOT have access to all this crap. Period.
I don't buy, for a second, that they are looking at phone records in aggregate CES. They are tracking a network of calls, like you would trace a thought pattern through neurons with an MRI. They are looking at it person-by-person, and mapping calls for those that they are interested in.
But....so what?
I hope you are right! I honestly don't know the answer myself but from what I have heard, it didn't seem likely.

I was referring more to Haze's comment about tracking of data by private companies, not so much the verizon stuff. With verizon, i get that they're looking at network activity, and have the ability and 'permission' to pinpoint individuals within that activity.
It makes me nervous....because there is a possibility of false accusations based on bad algorithms, or the potential to misuse the data for political or personal gain. It also reminds me a little bit of the brouhaha about libraries being forced to secretly report patron usage patterns.
Besides, i may be boring, but it's no one's business who i talk to on the phone- even if privacy is an illusion (as i type my opinion on the web for all to see...the lounge may be closed / not indexed but i doubt it's truly private)
I always hope I'm right![]()
