Wow. What bull****.
Key sentence being "The prosecutor said irrespective of whether it was an e-cig the regulations defined the offence as including "any
tobacco or any other product intended to be smoked"."
How can an e-cig be considered a "
tobacco product or any other product intended to be smoked""? Technically, using an e-cig isn't smoking at all. "Smoking" would at least imply that you were inhaling smoke from something being burned. I suspect the main issue may have been that his e-cig strongly resembled a real cigarette.