The front page of today's New York Times has an article "E-cigarettes, by other names lure young and worry experts."
The gist of the article is that studies may understate the use of e-cigs by teens because, well... let's let a user explain:
It's an interesting notion. Personally, I think it requires a San Francisco byline to come up with such fine distinctions, but who knows? We can be pretty sure that this new idea is going to grabbed instantly by the antis, and they aren't going to wait for any studies before using it as often as possible.
PS The writer of the article gets my award for the "Best Description Of What's In an E-Cig:" "...addictive nicotine and unregulated swirl of other chemicals."
The gist of the article is that studies may understate the use of e-cigs by teens because, well... let's let a user explain:
SAN FRANCISCO — Olivia Zacks, 17, recently took a drag of peach-flavored vapor from a device that most people would call an e-cigarette.
But Ms. Zacks, a high school senior, does not call it that. In fact, she insists she has never even tried an e-cigarette. Like many teenagers, Ms. Zacks calls such products “hookah pens” or “e-hookahs” or “vape pipe."
The new products and new names have health authorities wondering if they are significantly underestimating use because they are asking the wrong questions when they survey people about e-cigarettes.
It's an interesting notion. Personally, I think it requires a San Francisco byline to come up with such fine distinctions, but who knows? We can be pretty sure that this new idea is going to grabbed instantly by the antis, and they aren't going to wait for any studies before using it as often as possible.
PS The writer of the article gets my award for the "Best Description Of What's In an E-Cig:" "...addictive nicotine and unregulated swirl of other chemicals."
Last edited: