- See more at: Are E-Cigarettes a Good Thing?E-cigarette use is on the rise in the US and Europe. Use among children and teens is limited, and it appears EC is less likely to lead to continuous use, as compared to traditional cigarettes. From this dataset, it appears ECs are less addicting than traditional cigarettes and contain less known carcinogens.
Sounds good and of course it's positive that some MD's seem to be supportive, and are prepared to write articles to that effect, but I do have some concerns about this. Mainly that the author just does not have a clue what he's writing about!!
If you read through to the end, the author includes caveats that the studies he refers to did not cover "the increasing practice of vaping". As if his understanding is that using e-cigarettes and what he believes is "vaping" are two entirely different activities. Furthermore he goes on to suggest that "vaping" is related to using drugs like "cannabinoids" or "alcohol flavorings". It seems to me like the author is fundamentally not understanding that the studies he writes about DO cover what we commonly refer to as "vaping"!
Elsewhere, the author implies ALL e-cigarette vapours are cytotoxic. However if you read through the Addiction piece on which the article is based, it refers to 1 of 21 e-cig vapours tested as being cytotoxic, which apparently was related to coffee flavouring. Maybe that is just a misunderstanding but it's quite an important one.
That was my feelings on it, what do you think? Perhaps Dr Frank J Domino needs some education about what vaping is?