I can feel my stomach churning in anticipation, everyone will envy my 50 cal chameleon
So are you working on the 308 and 50cal prototypes separatley? can we expect the 50cal to be released at a later date than the 308?
Scorched,
The entire line was not supposed to be announced at the same time. Nothing wrong that it was, but it wasn't in my plans. Basically the bullet design is the bullet design. Accommodating for different
batteries and different atties is just a matter of changing the dimensions, to suit that particular battery.
That being said, each calibre is specifically designed around a specific native atty and battery combo. For example the 308's package will offer a totally different vape than the 7mm, because of the atty and battery combo. Going from an non IMR batt in the 308 with an LR shorty will change its characteristics yet again, but deliver nonetheless. I did not have an IMR batt at th time proto 1 was tested, it was for proof of concept. I did not have an LR shorty, it was used with a IKV HV shorty 3.5Ohm on a Screwdriver 16340 original batt. It blew me away, and that combo was grossly under powered. I wasn't worried because Isaac was going to fit an LR shorty to it and the proper batt prior to shipment to Jack.
Two folks that have tried the LR801 shorty with an IMR batt are Vapourmadness and Isaac that I know of, now combine that combo with the eGo style vaporisation and you have something unique that delivers a punch that will not knock you on your keester perse, but you know you've just received a hit.
The entire concept of different calibres, released at different times during the year was to prevent folks from lining up for the 50 cal and 20mm. Bigger is not always better. I toyed with the 901 native connection for the 7mm and decided on the 510. 901s are not as popular (although I like them), and inexperienced drippers would be frustrated with the leakage not to mention the delicate balance between just right and flooded that experienced 901 users know about.
The only different caliber is the 50 cal that will be capable of 3.7 and 6V. They will all perform the same and outside of battery longevity, will deliver. FWIW the 20mm will be equipped with the 26500 vice the 26650 because of the better battery. 2300 over the 4000mAh (reported as inflated) and with performance characteristics much better than its 4000mAh counterpart. Furthermore, I am awaiting the release of the 18350 IMRs from AW scheduled to be released end of Feb/March time frame for the 50 cal.
So as you can see it is not as simple as pumping out a PV, I have been toying with the idea for quite some time. Finding a suitable approach to introduce another all mechanical PV had to be carefully considered. I believe the development of the calibre concept will do just that. It combines numerous features, some undisclosed to make it different and something sought after, besides its uniqueness (bullet shape).
A long answer to your question perhaps. The short answer is no. Once the 308s are delivered I will then start on the 7mm, and so on and so forth, with the goal of having all 4 calibres released in the year to culminate with the commemorative set available for Christmas. In 2012 well we will see what transpires this year

If we looked at what took place in 2010 and the exponential growth of features towards
vaping Nirvana, to speculate on a direction at this time would indeed be per-mature.
I have toyed with the 37mm canon round, which would be a 7.4V version of the 20mm. Folks would go absolutely ballistic with this
device. I will not produce it, not even for myself, although I have the capability. Why? Far too much energy would be released during a thermal runaway, regardless of safer chemistry. I know I don't want to be around in the case of a mishap. Would you?