Not true
The "nut job" here in Utah is most defenetly RIGHT WING
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Defeat-Paul-Ray-Political-Action-Page/363186063796455
And the last time I checked, Christie was a Republican.
Need help from former MFS (MyFreedomSmokes) customers
Has any found a supplier or company that has tobacco e-juice like or very similar to MFS Turbosmog, Tall Paul, or Red Luck?
Not true
The "nut job" here in Utah is most defenetly RIGHT WING
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Defeat-Paul-Ray-Political-Action-Page/363186063796455
Those of you who are not from WA should be concerned....if this passes is could set a precedent for other states to follow.
Here's my theory - the right wing (and their associated media) aren't supporting e-cigs because they want us to be healthy and live long lives, they support them because big tobacco has jumped on board the e-cig bandwagon and that's where their money comes from.
The left is getting lobbied (and paid) by big pharma, who sees its profits sinking as people turn to e-cigs as an alternative - and one that works better than what they have to offer.
I suspect that rather than taxing and banning e-cigs, the right will try to regulate (despite their professed hatred of regulation) smaller companies out of business so big tobacco can monopolize the market. They'll be gearing up for that soon.
Just my theory.![]()
After vapers, who will they rob next is the question nonvapers should be asking themselves.
Thanks for the heads up. It's a 198 now.Just sharing this again, I can't believe only 197 people have signed it so far.
Petitioning Democratic Party Strategists
Hold Democrats to "Science over Ideology" regarding e-cigarettes
http://www.change.org/petitions/dem...-science-over-ideology-regarding-e-cigarettes
I just got an e-mail from the Washington Vapers Advocacy Network. Here's what it said in part.
"Even worse, an amendment has been introduced that would tax e-cigarettes by nicotine concentration. Washington Legislators are proposing a $28 tax on a 15 ml bottle of 2.4% nicotine juice.
If this amendment passes, a 30 ML bottle of 2.4% liquid would taxed at an OUTRAGEOUS $57.60. No, were not kidding. Its that bad."
Wonder why they stopped at 95% and not just hit the full 100%? Either way it's completely ludicrous to tax anything at that rate.
Are regular smokes taxed at that rate in WA?
Yes if it passes I see a lot more joining the band wagon and putting the tax on e cigs and related devices...sucks down right illegal to hit E cigs and not the regular cigs...
I think it would be $7.50+75%+$28 which would be $41.12. I'm not really sure how it would work, but either way it's outrageously ridiculous.Wow...just....wow. That makes it seem like it is not about money at all. It seems that rather than ban it, they want to make it "financially nonviable". Considering a 30ml from Mt Baker is currently $7.50, that would make the new total $65.10 or just over an 860% markup!!! No one is going to pay that any more than someone would pay $65 for a SINGLE PACK of smokes...and they know it.