I suppose then we need a definitive meaning of "commercial endeavor". Or of a connection to what extent of a commercial endeavor. Because in Roxy's case, yes she helped DESIGN an atty, and she gets to have her name on Augvape's website as "Designed by AugVape and Roxy". But she is NOT involved in the BUSINESS, and NOT receiving ANY financial or material compensation for her involvement in the atty's design.I see a conflict of interest kind of thing here with Roxy and her commercial endeavors. I hope everyone involved stays level headed and this is just a quick bump in the road. I'm sure Roxy can continue to post without mentioning that one area of her vape life.
I also believe that the mods should recognize Roxy's enormous contribution to this site and find a way to both forgive and move on. A failure to do so will result in a lot more than just one less member.
#Roxyrocks
How is Roxy's involvement in this particular atty any different from the MANY attys Quorax for example has been instrumental in helping design, suggesting design elements for, reviewing them after receiving beta or comped versions for him to do so, and thereby basically promoting them with his glowing reviews?
Can anyone explain to me the different set of rules or standards that would apply where Quorax is apparently allowed to do repeatedly what Roxy apparently has done once and seemingly been banished for?

