Disagree with what? That it is ugly or has a wattage limit? It is very understandable that some people find things aesthetically pleasing and that others do not, but I think you will agree many people have stated the Darwin is one extremely funky looking device...in an industry that has a lot of funky looking devices.
What did I state that you interpret as Darwin doesn't work at what it does? Does it have a wattage limit? Yes this isn't a debatable fact. Does that make it "not perform" no, I didn't say that. Does it have a swing arm that won't support some tanks? Yes of course you don't have to be an expert to see this. Does that mean it won't vape? No.
I never promoted the Lavatube as the best PV around. Unlike some people I do not go around viewing one mod as the best PV around but rather say, have said, and will probably always say it is dependent on what the user wants. You should try that, listening to what the user wants before making a suggestion. Your agrresive error laden tone isn't conductive to a good exchange of information.
First, EVERY PV has power limitations. You inferred that because the Darwin also has a top & bottom end in power output that it made it less than a top of the line model. You are playing games.
Second, box mods like the Big Daddy are extremely funky looking devices, also. Looks are subjective. Cigarettes are pretty stupid looking when you get right down to it. So what is your point, other than to be argumentative.
And the "user" or OP of this thread was asking for the "Rolls Royce" of PV's. When it comes to consistent performance (no battery drain), flexibility, battery charge, charging and vaping at the same time and the automatic ability to change the power output to match the change in resistence of the atty/carto, that is the Darwin NOT any model you have mentioned. Are their other models that are also in that class, relatively speaking, yes. Your denigrating those features does not change the fact that it amounts to one of the best models on the market. Inferring, that a box mod without those technical features is on par with a model that has those features is disingenuous. Whether that is what the OP wants or needs is subjective.
And as usual from past experience, there was no arguements occurring until you chimed in. Before that, people were providing suggestions of ones they thought fit the "Rolls Royce" class of PV's without knocking other's suggestions.
Last edited:
copy and paste the link to see it
