What's that old saying?
The prudent person hopes for the best, but plans for the worst.
There is no clear citation I could find.
It's been attributed to a number of people.
What's that old saying?
The prudent person hopes for the best, but plans for the worst.
Oh, I think they listened alright, but not for any other reason than to take notes on how to formulate a game plan.You can't be this naive. I've been in this game since 09, they plan to kill the industry. It's what they wanted. Both BT and BP do not want people to quit smoking and the government does not want to give up the easy tax revenue that they get from cigarettes. Big Tobacco has done this before with roll you own, and by encouraging regulations that would cripple competition. There is nothing preventing them from doing this again.
They have played games this last 7 years only to look like they planned to listen, they never did. The FDA is the enemy of the people, it's time you realize that.
Agreed 110%.@UnclePsyko ^^ Ditto.
Another obvious ploy used by our opponents that seems to be totally
over looked.
Agent Provocateurs.
: one employed to associate with suspected persons and by pretending sympathy with their aims to incite them to some incriminating action.
This does not only mean incriminating as in breaking the law.
a person who commits, or who acts to entice another person to commit an illegal or "rash act "
'parentheses mine'
The rash act being to encourage and or foster beliefs detrimental to ones cause.
We had them in the peace movement. We had them in the smokers right groups.
IMHO they are also here. I may not (in fact I don't) know who they are but, I see
there finger prints everywhere on this sight.
Due to the nature of the subject mater here I know people are passionate about
their idea's and truly believe in them. This is undeniable. That is also why it is
impossible to ferret out those who do not have our best interests in mind.
Regards
Mike
Guests can't post and thus have no way to influence discussions on the forumAgreed 110%.
The Moderators can see the "Guests" viewing the threads, I no longer can but sometimes in these touchy discussions, I get a bit suspicious who these "Guests" are and why they are so interested in our discussions.
I'm sure the majority are curious onlookers, but a few of them... ???
OH, and by the way, I don't wear tin foil... I swear!
Damn!... Looks like you guys with the tin foil hats were right all along!Guests and lurkers just go with the territory of forum boards. Could be anyone, members who prefer to read only, curious vaper/smoker who wound up here via a Google search, FDA agents, BT researchers who plan to re-invent the wheel once they win their secure product classifications.
I wear a tin foil hat, and have thought for some time that BT knows that cigalikes don't work, and they have seen the writing on the wall by the rapid advancement of vaping and it's popularity. If only there was a way to set the clock back in time, then they could introduce second and third generation devices and get them approved one by one and keep all of the profits to themselves. An added plus is they will be able to spin it to look like they were the good guys in the end, because they introduced safer nicotine products, because, you know...they really do care about their customers![]()
Damn!... Looks like you guys with the tin foil hats were right all along!![]()
It won't end vaping, I promise you.
All this panic and outcry..
You guys do know beer, wine and liquor are all alcohol but are regulated differently with different taxes, manufacturing and process? The same will apply for vaping vs. cigarettes, snuff and other NDS.
It won't cost a million dollars like everyone is .....ing, it isn't cigarettes; it won't be the same fees; in fact if you go to the FDA site and read the I'm a manufacturer page, there's no fees even up yet; a deeming regulation is yet to determine what the true cost or process will be.
So your favorite vape shop will not stock up mg levels that don't sell, juice suppliers won't continue making levels that aren't in demand and is vapers will get a surplus of our favorite nic levels in stock.
[removed]
Don't forget there are vaping millionaires looking to invest in small companies and turn them to money making corporations, expect to see the rise in actual real deal high volume companies.
Alas, we always find workarounds the law. BB guns can't be shipped to NY by federal law yet they do it anyway, regulars in bars still smoke indoors and we will continue to survive past this.
To think the gov won't collect their sin tax for this long is all but an illusion. They calculated this for years, when vaping is now in its prime it's the perfect time for the hand to dip in the cookie jar.
Everything will be ok.
Anybody who expects to be a life long vaper will be rebuilding and mixing eventually because of quality and price. My DIY costs about 7 cents a day, $30 a year. (I used to spend $3,000 a year smoking a carton a week.)
Congress did not give the FDA authority to ban tobacco but they did give it the authority to ban electronic cigarettes. They have authority to do anything at any time for any reason so the rules are for chumps. There is historical precedent for this kind of power, you might have encountered in your legal dabblings, called the Divine Right of Kings. We don't govern that way any more because it promotes corruption and incompentence and discourages business formation and risk taking.
@UnclePsyko ^^ Ditto.
Another obvious ploy used by our opponents that seems to be totally
over looked.
Agent Provocateurs.
: one employed to associate with suspected persons and by pretending sympathy with their aims to incite them to some incriminating action.
This does not only mean incriminating as in breaking the law.
a person who commits, or who acts to entice another person to commit an illegal or "rash act "
'parentheses mine'
The rash act being to encourage and or foster beliefs detrimental to ones cause.
We had them in the peace movement. We had them in the smokers right groups.
IMHO they are also here. I may not (in fact I don't) know who they are but, I see
there finger prints everywhere on this sight.
Due to the nature of the subject mater here I know people are passionate about
their idea's and truly believe in them. This is undeniable. That is also why it is
impossible to ferret out those who do not have our best interests in mind.
Regards
Mike
I realized in the first couple of days of vaping that I was going to beat smoking. I took six weeks to switch to make sure it didn't fail. How I feel now, mostly, is grateful. I want to give back.Well said. Man you are a cheap date.Good luck.
I realized in the first couple of days of vaping that I was going to beat smoking. I took six weeks to switch to make sure it didn't fail. How I feel now, mostly, is grateful. I want to give back.
My hunch is the FDA has blundered. By interfering with smokers switching to vaping they are poisoning people not so differently than the water situtation in Flint, Michigan, which is a public health fiasco caused by public health.
Damn!... Looks like you guys with the tin foil hats were right all along!![]()
In cases like this... Boy, you have no idea!Don't you hate it when that happens?