admittedly i am a relatively new to e-cigs. i quit smoking 3 months ago and i absolutely love them... when they work!
currently though, it seems as that we are in the "wild west days" of E-cigs. there's lots of user confusion, widely varying product quality, lack of universal standards and scams.
the learning curve for e-cigs knowledge is far from sharp. it's mired in a dozen different battery/atomizer/cartridge models each of which have several names for the same device! for instance an E9 is also called an 808D-2 meanwhile there is no appreciable difference in performance between an E8 and an E9, well except for the fact that one is 1 mm greater in diameter and has a different thread pitch between its sub-components.
i'm not complaining, just making an observation that the messy state of things is common in all new industries. in the future, if e-cigs gain more popuarity and are not banned, i see the standardization of device parameters and a more cohesive lexicon that is easily understood by all users.
currently though, it seems as that we are in the "wild west days" of E-cigs. there's lots of user confusion, widely varying product quality, lack of universal standards and scams.
the learning curve for e-cigs knowledge is far from sharp. it's mired in a dozen different battery/atomizer/cartridge models each of which have several names for the same device! for instance an E9 is also called an 808D-2 meanwhile there is no appreciable difference in performance between an E8 and an E9, well except for the fact that one is 1 mm greater in diameter and has a different thread pitch between its sub-components.
i'm not complaining, just making an observation that the messy state of things is common in all new industries. in the future, if e-cigs gain more popuarity and are not banned, i see the standardization of device parameters and a more cohesive lexicon that is easily understood by all users.