this guy deserves a monster pile on!

[electrowoman]

The danger of E-cigarettes, part 1: Smoke-laced vapor - National Psychological Health | Examiner.com

this article is top to bottom BS. saw in the news forum. i already piled on.

 

[C-kool Dad '09]

Good job of 'Piling on' EW!

 

[MlrGrl]

EW, JMitch & Kristin - WTG!

JMitch - May I have the link on the military study you found, please.
I'd love to add it to the file.

 

[Jmitchelliv]

I just did a brief search and came up with this: Propylene Glycol Research Study Results

 

[316lvm]

Thanks for posting this EW.
I registered and then proceeded to pile it on. I also read some of his articles.

The e-cig article and the ADHD article had me foaming at the mouth and cursing a blue streak. The man can't even differentiate between ADHD and ADD.

E-cigs use combustion to produce smoke. My .....

What a nimrod.

 

[Jmitchelliv]

"Nimrod" is an old term formerly used in British countries meaning "Great Hunter."

I don't know if that applies here. I'd settle on "........." though.

 

[Vicks Vap-oh-Yeah]

The names I'd REALLY like to pile on him all have variations of 4 letters....and would get starred out here

 

[MlrGrl]

The names I'd REALLY like to pile on him all have variations of 4 letters....and would get starred out here

I'm thinking of a compound word...but each word has 4 letters in it

 

[Vicks Vap-oh-Yeah]

there are so many different compound words to choose from...and I learned most of 'em over at the forum which cannot be mentioned here

 

[BradSmith]

Wow what a tool. I piled on. That is really sad. Dang that site had enough pop ups!!! Even had pop ups for e-cigs. LOL

 

[MlrGrl]

there are so many different compound words to choose from...and I learned most of 'em over at the forum which cannot be mentioned here

That's exactly where I learned the word! LOL
It's the one I told you was my favorite & ends in ".....ard"hee hee hee

 

[Vicks Vap-oh-Yeah]

lulz!

You got that one right - he definately fits all the charateristics of a .....ard!

 

[Daifne]

He posted a part 2 that basically just bashes the comments from part 1. Electronic cigarettes, part 2, Warning whispers - National Psychological Health | Examiner.com

 

[DesiG]

This was my response to his part 2 of warning whispers, though by reading through his ad hominem attack on the previous posted comments, he will blow my comment off as well

SSir, could you please;
1) Share with your readers the peer reviewed, scientific research studies that you used to formulate your opinions that you have shared? Using the links you provided in your part one article, I find a series of news releases, summaries, and media updates. These, I assume you would agree, do not constitute links to peer reviewed, published research study results. Citing one's sources is an important part of imparting information for publication.
2) Share with your readers your credentials that would indicate competence in evaluating the aforementioned published research studies.
3) Provide the results of your submission to the material testing lab- redacting the name of the lab as you indicated would be necessary for privacy concerns, although, it would seem that if the lab in question was unwilling to stand behind it's work, one should wonder why.
4) Include in your anecdotal testing more than the oldest technology cartomizer available, and include the options such as direct dripping or the new tank atomizers that use no filler material at all.
5) Understand that it is possible that you are incorrect in your conclusions- especially if they are based on faulty, incomplete, or one sided sources (as your sources seem to be), and accept that you may need to explore both sides of the debate and examine the information that each side provides prior to publishing your articles.