FDA Tobacco CEOs Push FDA to Adopt E-Cig Rules More Quickly

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
66

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,927
Wisconsin
Carl V. Phillips, an advocate for e-cig consumers who also attended the conference, said he has concerns that companies would use the regulatory process to force some competitors out of the market. The wide range of current options is one of the things that make e-cigs appealing, he said.

“The variety of products and the constant innovation made it possible for millions of smokers to quit, by using e-cigarettes,” said Phillips, who serves as chief scientific officer for the Consumer Advocates for Smoke-free Alternatives Association. “Any rapid move to tighten control over e-cigs will do far more harm than good.”

Cameron said in the interview that she doesn’t want to limit competition. Her fear is that the vapor category will go “rogue” and ruin the opportunity for everyone.

“We do need the FDA to help put a box around it so that we know how to continue to innovate,” she said.

Not saying I agree with logic of this quote, but does help with spin of OP in this thread.
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
66
Altria began urging the FDA to impose the deeming regulation back in 2010 because it wanted to gain control of the cigar industry, and began urging FDA to impose the deeming reg on e-cigs in 2011.

In contrast, none of the other tobacco companies began to privately support the deeming regulation until last year.

Now, the largest tobacco company executives are urging the FDA to quickly implement the deeming regulation on e-cigs (and to ban PVs and e-liquids) because they know:
- PVs and e-liquids pose a huge threat to future cigarette and cigalike e-cig sales (without the deeming regulation),
- sales of PVs and e-liquids are skyrocketing, sales of cigarettes keep falling, and sales of cigalikes are now stagnant,
- PVs and e-liquids are far more effective than cigalikes for quitting smoking and reducing cigarette consumption,
- PVs and e-liquids cost about 33% of the price of cigalikes, and about 25% of the price of cigarettes,
- their cigarettes and cigalike e-cigs won't be able to compete in a free market against PVs and e-liquid,
- they can afford the $10-$40 million it would cost to submit new tobacco product applications for each of their several cigalike brands,
- 99% of PV and e-liquid manufacturers cannot afford the $10-$40 million to submit a new product application,
- FDA is very unlikely to approve any new tobacco product application for a PV or e-liquid even if applications are submitted,
- FDA would need to approve several new tobacco product applications for cigalike brands before sending cease-and-desist letters to PV and e-liquid manufacturers, and
- FDA will be facing increasing pressure from vapers to approve new product applications for PVs and e-liquid as their sales continue to skyrocket.

The best ways to prevent the FDA from imposing the deeming regulation on e-cigs include continuously exposing (to the media, FDA and Congress) how it would:
- protect cigarettes from market competition by far less hazardous PVs and e-liquid,
- ban >99.9% of all e-cig products on the market (including those most effective for quitting smoking and reducing cigarette consumption),
- threaten the lives of most vapers, smokers and secondhand smokers,
- give the e-cig industry to Big Tobacco companies and allow sales of only more expensive and inferior cigalike brands, and
- create a huge black market for PVs and e-liquids, which would increase product risks and reduce quality control.
 
Last edited:

JMarca

E-Cig Afficionado
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 19, 2013
1,522
1,987
46
New York
Yeah, who didn't see that coming.

Just more of the same from Big Tobacco, who are now firmly establishing themselves as our enemies.
I guess it's now safe to add them to the list of those who want to crush the life-saving technology that we have all found.

Good times!!

Just wait till they get what they want and all the "associations" (antz) start getting a cut from e-cig sales. I bet then they'll do a complete 180 and start saying how safe they are. Human greed never ceases to disappoint me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread