Unflavored is non toxic but some flavors are close too

[caramel]

http:// www. eurekalert. org/pub_releases/2015-05/ats-ecf050815.php

Electronic cigarette flavorings alter lung function at the cellular level | EurekAlert! Science News

 

[retired1]

Enough!

PLEASE READ! Breaking Links to Junk Science and Other Rubbish Posts | E-Cigarette Forum

 

[caramel]

Woot the study finds that only 3 flavors in 13 pose any problems.

 

[retired1]

I'd hardly put any faith in a rag that doesn't even fact check what's posted there.

Disclaimer
AAAS disclaims responsibility for the accuracy of material posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions and for the use of any information obtained through EurekAlert!. Support from sponsors does not influence content or policy.

'Nuff said.

 

[caramel]

I'd hardly put any faith in a rag that doesn't even fact check what's posted there.
.

Agreed. However as we know them ATS are trying really hard to find something, anything, and when they can't find it, it just confirms, one step at a time, that there's nothing to be found.

I can also spin it as "More than 75% of flavours found safe by ATS" or similar just to tease the antz.

 

[sonicbomb]

Another flying coprolite

 

[skoony]

100 years of industrial food production disagrees.
daily safe exposure limits are well known.
mike

 

[sofarsogood]

There must be some things with flavoring potential that should be avoided. That's not news. Science research could help identify those and help us and the industry avoid them. That would be common sense. Is that science being done? These kinds of articles are usually alarmist and not informative. We can usually rely on Dr. F to provide at least some perspective. I've said before, he's the only researcher I trust.

 

[Robert Cromwell]

cinnamon? I can agree that it is not good to inhale, but good to eat
Menthol sucks too.
But then taste or lack thereof is very subjective

 

[caramel]

Well it also suggests that arbitrarily selecting "tobacco and menthol" flavors as "approved as non-attractive to The Children" may do more harm than good.

ANTZ need to drop the "children" from the discussion, or they'll find themselves in a position where they're recommending the wrong policies.