• This forum has been archived

    If you'd like to post a thread, post it here instead!

    View Forum

Vapeing in commercial vehicles ? Legal Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

Northernshrink

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 21, 2012
1,397
3,376
52
Bracebridge Ont Canada
So long story short last August I received a 305.00 dollar fine for smokeing in a commercial vehicle I was sitting in a parking lot and this guy walks up and shows me a badge. I cant remember the exact wording but something about tobacoo enforcement (didnt even know there was such a thing). So basicly I am curious if I can be tagged for the same thing for vapeing ?
 

FunkyVapes

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2011
1,881
1,042
35
Niagara Falls, Canada
I don't want to comment with any form of certainty, but they cannot charge you for smoking in a commercial vehicle (which is what the charge is) because even under our ambiguous regime, it is understood that smoking laws do not apply to people using PVs. However, if it was a private enforcement officer from the company itself, that is entirely anther matter and would default to the contract that you signed (if any) upon being hired.
 

Toronto_Mike

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Dec 2, 2011
884
597
Toronto, Canada
In Ontario, you could be charged for smoking in a commercial vehicle - it is by definition a considered as a workplace. As far as e-cig goes - the answer would be no - it is not smoking.

I have wondered though if the talking while driving/texting/operating a GPS etc while driving law charges would still apply since an e-cig is an electronic device just like the above.
 

Northernshrink

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 21, 2012
1,397
3,376
52
Bracebridge Ont Canada
I don't want to comment with any form of certainty, but they cannot charge you for smoking in a commercial vehicle (which is what the charge is) because even under our ambiguous regime, it is understood that smoking laws do not apply to people using PVs. However, if it was a private enforcement officer from the company itself, that is entirely anther matter and would default to the contract that you signed (if any) upon being hired.

The company is fine with smokeing in our vehicles our only policy is if we have a non smoker to respect that and not smoke. They actually sent my ticket to the legal department for review as we are a major corporation and this was only the second fine anyone had received.
 

Concat

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 3, 2011
1,590
572
Edmonton, AB
Smoke-Free Ontario Act, S.O. 1994, c. 10

“enclosed public place” means,
(a) the inside of any place, building or structure or vehicle or conveyance or a part of any of them,
(i) that is covered by a roof, and
(ii) to which the public is ordinarily invited or permitted access, either expressly or by implication, whether or not a fee is charged for entry, or

Prohibition
9. (1) No person shall smoke tobacco or hold lighted tobacco in any enclosed public place or enclosed workplace. 2005, c. 18, s. 9.

As you can see, the law specifically says "smoke tobacco" or "hold lighted tobacco." Technically you could smoke oak leaves in your vehicle and it would be legal. The fact that your PV isn't even smoke should only strengthen your resolve.
 

Mr.Whitecloud

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 28, 2012
449
261
62
Richmond B.C
Just another tax grab by our faithful and honest govt:blink: I work in commercial vehicles ride trains etc and have never been bothered by the authorities.....took a hit right in front of a transit cop asked what it was... explained thought it was cool... went on his merry way.I vape on mine just about everywhere,get the odd strange look but no one has ever tried to call the cops or tell me what i was doing was illegal.The tobacco enforcement in Ontario better wise up before they get their own asses hauled into court for false accusations and maybe train the staff better on law.
 

Toronnah

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 10, 2012
900
1,380
Canada
Vaping in a commercial vehicle is 100% legal. Full stop.

If a cop wants to be ignorant to the law, well we can't predict such things.

Again, you are missing the point. Quote the law to a Ministry of Labour enforcement officer. They get paid overtime to show up at court to hear your charges dismissed.

What you also fail to realize is that the exclusion of e-cigs from the legislation does not mean the MOL can't make a roadside decision. Smoking in a vehicle falls under workplace safety, not smoking in public legislation. You ate producing an unknown substance into the air. At a roadside stop, you cannot prove to the MOL officer what the liquid is you are burning in an enclosed vehicle.


You really have no idea how much power some of the government enforcement officers have
 

Concat

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 3, 2011
1,590
572
Edmonton, AB
Again, you are missing the point. Quote the law to a Ministry of Labour enforcement officer. They get paid overtime to show up at court to hear your charges dismissed.

What you also fail to realize is that the exclusion of e-cigs from the legislation does not mean the MOL can't make a roadside decision. Smoking in a vehicle falls under workplace safety, not smoking in public legislation. You ate producing an unknown substance into the air. At a roadside stop, you cannot prove to the MOL officer what the liquid is you are burning in an enclosed vehicle.


You really have no idea how much power some of the government enforcement officers have

Ok well I don't know jack about labor laws in Ontario, but smoking in a commercial vehicle does fall under the Smoke Free Act in Ontario. I quoted it earlier in the topic. If vaping somehow violates a workplace safety law, seems to me it's not something we can predict. Here in Alberta we have "distracted driving" laws. Could a cop issue me a ticket for vaping under that law? I suppose they could. But there's no smoking laws being violated.

I guess I'm just saying that we can be charged for all sorts of obscure laws for doing all sorts of mundane things. If it takes a team of lawyers to figure out if the law has been broken, well then I figure the law itself is broken.

Oh and the liquid isn't burned, otherwise there would be smoke :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread