VaporChase Review: The Joyetech eRoll

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cartoon Dude

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 22, 2008
192
56
Planet of the Vapes
Good review, I'd agree on the "80% flavor" comment. The only downside I've found is the small capacity of the tank (0.6 mL), the battery will far outlast the liquid. Wish the PCC held 2 spare tanks. But otherwise happy and impressed with the eRoll so far. I didn't have any of the manufacturing issues you mentioned on the first (and only) battery I used so far.
 

Mindfield

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 28, 2010
5,029
2,631
53
Toronto, ON
Good review, I'd agree on the "80% flavor" comment. The only downside I've found is the small capacity of the tank (0.6 mL), the battery will far outlast the liquid. Wish the PCC held 2 spare tanks. But otherwise happy and impressed with the eRoll so far. I didn't have any of the manufacturing issues you mentioned on the first (and only) battery I used so far.

I agree that it would have been nice if they maybe made the case a bit wider and allowed room for maybe a couple of tanks or maybe a spare assembled device. Which actually brought me to another thing that I didn't think of at the time of this review (because my other battery broke so I wasn't using it), I wish they included a second atomizer cover so you could have two fully-assembled devices. That seems like a pretty glaring oversight when you think about it.

Glad to hear yours didn't have any problems. I figured mine was one of those rare manufacturing defects that both killed the one battery and didn't allow me to twist the atomizer cover over the other. It happens and I don't hold it against them for that, I guess it was just my turn to get one. (I've gotten defects before, but from companies with questionable QC to begin with; I'd expect it to be much more rare with a company like Joyetech.)
 

Cartoon Dude

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 22, 2008
192
56
Planet of the Vapes
Agreed on the atomizer cover, odd omission. The more I use the eRoll, the more I wish the actual cig wasn't under that PCC cover, perhaps somehow spring-clicked into place like a click pen. Or maybe a flip-top cover. It's kind of a hassle to open it up each time.

Overall though it's a nice companion device to my eGo-C. The two extra tanks give it about the same capacity as a clearomizer. Happy with the purchase.
 

Mindfield

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 28, 2010
5,029
2,631
53
Toronto, ON
Agreed on the atomizer cover, odd omission. The more I use the eRoll, the more I wish the actual cig wasn't under that PCC cover, perhaps somehow spring-clicked into place like a click pen. Or maybe a flip-top cover. It's kind of a hassle to open it up each time.

Overall though it's a nice companion device to my eGo-C. The two extra tanks give it about the same capacity as a clearomizer. Happy with the purchase.

Indeed, it's one of the best superminis I've tried, which surprised me. I don't mind the PCC really. They're going for a bit of extra style, which I understand -- and honestly appreciate. I think they've been taking a cue from companies like Innokin, who in my opinion have been doing well in leading the pack in making mass market devices that look as good as they work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread