When Alexander mundy made his magic ribbon coil, it was the first time I really seen it and it was very interesting. I did manage to get some and try it, and was really one of the first exotic coils that came out. I then bought and still have a spool of the ribbon or flat wire which was used and experimented for a while and at least with my particular rtas, wattages, and vape style I couldn't really tell major difference, so went back to round because it is simply easier to use. Perhaps sub ohm builds or more wattage builds the difference is more, so the only way to know is to experiment...good luckMorten Oen has a video where he talks about the differences between flat wire and clapton. It's a very interesting video and he provides science in his comparison. Flat wire, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, has more surface area than round wire and will use the same amount power to produce the same level of warmth.
sounds like an artifact from some rpg game.magic ribbon coil
sounds like an artifact from some rpg game.
Any pics of it? I've tried 2google it and haven't found a vape coil in pics.
Glad ya liked it. Rectangle wire is pretty much all I use anymore especially in mechs.I picked up some Ni80 rectangle wire about 6 months ago after reading posts from @Don29palms
I got the Ni80 0.3x0.9mm rectangle wire from Kaybee Vapes. I quickly ordered another 100' spool of the Ni80, and also picked up the SS316 while I was at it.
I like higher ohm builds and lower power. I usually build single coil, so I run 7 wraps, 3mm, and it comes out to about 0.4 ohms. I haven't tries the SS316 yet.
It should provide a lot more surface area/mass ratio, and you get a lot of coil mass in contact with the cotton, while minimizing the mass of the coil.
What I've noticed with it is I get a nice dense vape from it, at lower power than I would have to run on an exotic coil. It also ramps up pretty darn fast for me, at least the Ni80. I use the coil above (single coil RDAs) on regulated devices about 32w, and it also vapes very well for me on unregulated devices such as my Lunas, Recurve mod, etc. That's probably a high ohm build for many folks, but I really like it. The fact that I can swap my RDA from a regulated to non-regulated device without having to rebuild it is also a positive to me.
I just wrapped another dozen coils last weekend so I have them ready. Really haven't used anything but the rectangle wire since trying it after Don's suggestion. Great wire to me.
Just realize Morten Oen is a liar and a con man that doesn't provide any science for anything. That being said as Score69 said I use nichrome80 .9mm x .3mm rectangle wire. I've found I get the same results using lower power. Nice big dense clouds with alot of great flavor. Ramp up time is just as good as using a simple round wire build.Morten Oen has a video where he talks about the differences between flat wire and clapton. It's a very interesting video and he provides science in his comparison. Flat wire, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, has more surface area than round wire and will use the same amount power to produce the same level of warmth.
Mundys magic wire. He is an ecf member that took a few strands of flat wire and twisted it. It was something no one had ever seen and it became quite popular about 6 or 7 years ago. At that time 32 and 30g was the norm with a few diving into really thick wire in 28g. I will try to look for a linksounds like an artifact from some rpg game.
Any pics of it? I've tried 2google it and haven't found a vape coil in pics.
Just realize Morten Oen is a liar and a con man that doesn't provide any science for anything. That being said as Score69 said I use nichrome80 .9mm x .3mm rectangle wire. I've found I get the same results using lower power. Nice big dense clouds with alot of great flavor. Ramp up time is just as good as using a simple round wire build.
https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/index.php?posts/10840754sounds like an artifact from some rpg game.
Any pics of it? I've tried 2google it and haven't found a vape coil in pics.
If you want to take advice from someone that is making stuff up as he goes and calls it "science" then be my guest. He uses thst stupid air chamber that is complete garbage and his computer generated animations are also garbage. His theories are unproven crap. The supposed air guru designed not one but 2 RDAs that are worth the metal they're made with. Morten Oen is a liar and a con man that shouldn't be taken seriously for anything he says starting from hello. He doesn't know what he's talking about.How is he con man? I've watched a few of his videos and he explains the methods he used to come up with his theory. We're talking about vaping were not splitting the atom so there is a lot of opinion. I put very little faith in reviewers for that reason.
A good example is Djlsb's review of the Innokin cool fire iv tc 18650. According to him it's not accurate in temp control by a good 40f. I've got that mod and several Evolv devices plus a SX mini m class and it's pretty dang close to those high end boards. Does that make Daniel a liar? Absolutely not! He's human and makes mistakes maybe his probe wasn't put in correctly, maybe the atomizer wasn't %100 stable etc. Just because a reviewer says "xx device/atomizer is great" or "xx device/atomizer is trash" doesn't make it true, with a few exceptions.
How is he con man? I've watched a few of his videos and he explains the methods he used to come up with his theory. We're talking about vaping were not splitting the atom so there is a lot of opinion. I put very little faith in reviewers for that reason.
A good example is Djlsb's review of the Innokin cool fire iv tc 18650. According to him it's not accurate in temp control by a good 40f. I've got that mod and several Evolv devices plus a SX mini m class and it's pretty dang close to those high end boards. Does that make Daniel a liar? Absolutely not! He's human and makes mistakes maybe his probe wasn't put in correctly, maybe the atomizer wasn't %100 stable etc. Just because a reviewer says "xx device/atomizer is great" or "xx device/atomizer is trash" doesn't make it true, with a few exceptions.
Same results compared to what?Just realize Morten Oen is a liar and a con man that doesn't provide any science for anything. That being said as Score69 said I use nichrome80 .9mm x .3mm rectangle wire. I've found I get the same results using lower power. Nice big dense clouds with alot of great flavor. Ramp up time is just as good as using a simple round wire build.
His airflow chamber is the biggest lie he has. It's not to scale which is the biggest part of proving any theory. It's a good show for a video tha proves absolutely nothing. Morten Oen to vaping is like the traveling snake oil salemen of days gone by. Oen is spouting dog feces. Prove it to yourself and pick up a book. Air flows different under vacuum than it does under pressure. Air also flows completely different than water especially air under vacuum and water under pressure. Wicking, that he never shows in his cardboard air chamber hoax, makes a big difference. Flow of any kind including airflow takes the path of least resistance. That's proven science. Airflow under vacuum from the top does not go down before it goes up. Oen puts on a good show to fool fools. He is a liar and a con man.I agree. Morten comes across as a very careful person. He even came back on some of his statements later, explaining how after consideration they were no longer tenable. I loved his work on airflow (with the little tp roll and this the vacuum cleaner). It really helped me understand how coil placement and airflow channels interact when I didn't have 20+ atomisers yet.