Log in
Register
Welcome to the world's largest e-cigarette website.
The voice of vaping since 2007
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Welcome to the world's largest e-cigarette website.
The voice of vaping since 2007
Forums
Forum list
New posts
Search forums
Leaderboards
Products
Search reviews
Brands-Connect
Latest content
Vaping.com
Disposable Vapes
Vape Juice
Vape Kits
Vape Pods
Vape Coils
Star Suppliers
Media
New media
Search media
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
E-Cigarette Community
New Members: Introduce Yourself!
whoa hi!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bombastinator" data-source="post: 23736263" data-attributes="member: 43994"><p>I never liked the word freebase. I think it was made up by people trying to sell salts. It makes it sound more dangerous and unpredictable than salts when in fact the reverse is true. Besides to call unprotonated nic “freebase” is only just barely accurate in the first place. It sounds like freebase ....... which is BS. I prefer the terms “unprotonated” and “protonated” as they are more accurate.</p><p></p><p>The advantages of salts are all for sellers. It has a longer shelf life (so higher profit) and can be more mild at really high concentrations which makes it more addictive. Theres basically nothing there for users. It’s all bad. For users “no way to tell what it actually is”, older product costing the same, and the ability of sellers to addict users even harder. Why would anyone do that!?</p><p></p><p>Because “freebase” is more “dangerous” because the word makes it sound like an unusually bad illegal drug famous people have been nearly killed by. When in actuality salts are worse.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bombastinator, post: 23736263, member: 43994"] I never liked the word freebase. I think it was made up by people trying to sell salts. It makes it sound more dangerous and unpredictable than salts when in fact the reverse is true. Besides to call unprotonated nic “freebase” is only just barely accurate in the first place. It sounds like freebase ....... which is BS. I prefer the terms “unprotonated” and “protonated” as they are more accurate. The advantages of salts are all for sellers. It has a longer shelf life (so higher profit) and can be more mild at really high concentrations which makes it more addictive. Theres basically nothing there for users. It’s all bad. For users “no way to tell what it actually is”, older product costing the same, and the ability of sellers to addict users even harder. Why would anyone do that!? Because “freebase” is more “dangerous” because the word makes it sound like an unusually bad illegal drug famous people have been nearly killed by. When in actuality salts are worse. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
E-Cigarette Community
New Members: Introduce Yourself!
whoa hi!
Top
Bottom
Forums
Products
Vaping.com
Star Suppliers
Blogs
Menu
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…