I tend to watch YT vape reviews when I can't find good written reviews, and that is becoming regular today.
DJLSb, Todd, Pbusardo, Mike Vapes, Zophie are my preferred. I cannot stand personality shows, or excessive mannerisms.
What drive me away from YT vape reviews is the partiality I'm perceiving. Few quick examples may explain my point better.
Take Pbusardo review of the Yihi ML class. What is the purpose of reviewing a failed mod? Why he didn't wait for a new functional device to complete the review? Who benefited from the review of a non-functional ML class mod?
Same with Pbusardo review of Dicodes n. 6. The screen image was distorted because of the battery unability to cope with a 0.05 Ohm coil, but he fault the mod for this.
The manufacturer responded the German way, as all new Dicodes devices now include a direct reading of the battery internal resistance, a pretty unique and useful feature.
Last example, the DJLSb review of the Therion. He destroys the mod on video when he isn't able to locate the four screws hiding under the two side wooden (or CF) strips, which are kept in place with double-sided adhesive tape.
What's the purpose in discouraging viewers from dismantling the Therion mod? I replace the board in the Therion all the times.
Again, mine are minor gripes. I can get good knowledge from their videos without actually buying all the mods.