Former tobacco-firm researcher explains nicotine addiction
He gives a fairly good analogy using ear-muffs of how nicotine works on the brain on page 2. This though is annoying if true:
I wonder if he was talking about those patents I found for PM's version of our electronic cigarettes or if it was an actual tobacco product.
He gives a fairly good analogy using ear-muffs of how nicotine works on the brain on page 2. This though is annoying if true:
“My job was to create a cigarette that wouldn’t kill people,” DeNoble said.
DeNoble said he invented that cigarette. His employer decided not to develop it because it would have to admit that it lied for decades when it said tobacco wasn’t addictive and it would cost too much money to remove the 160 tobacco products already on the market, DeNoble said.
Rather than being hailed as the inventor of a “safe” cigarette, DeNoble was fired. His response was to steal top secret files that eventually became a part of the evidence that forced tobacco companies to admit that their products were addictive and deadly, DeNoble said.
I wonder if he was talking about those patents I found for PM's version of our electronic cigarettes or if it was an actual tobacco product.
Last edited: