Pretty interested to see if the FDA gets away with regulating e-cigs and to what extent. They have no case and they know it but it doesn't mean it isn't coming. It seems to be a decision between getting gov tax revenue or being proactive in consumer health, which is what the FDA stands for. That is why the delay because where it stands now they cant make a logical argument. The most stupid argument is that e-cigs would somehow promote smoking to kids because they are flavored and act as a gateway to regular cigs, which is complete nonsense, Ask me why you would choose a regular cig once your smoking ecigs. There's only 3 ingredients in ecigs, all GRAS and basically FDA approved. The truth is ecigs are more healthy than reg cigs to an extent that you cant even compare the two.. and in fact Nicotine itself has many positive benefits.. with minor to no negative effects. Nicotine itself is similar to caffeine. Theres no second hand smoke, its basically water vapor, in fact it smells good. City councils all over are banning the use of ecigs in public places where smoking is banned but do not have a logical reason.. there seems to be a widespread ignorance of what ecigs are and misinformation campaign most likely because an e-cigarette looks similar to smoking, has been called smoking and has the same name but in reality it should not even be called a cigarette. The word vape is more appropriate. If we define a cigarette because it has nicotine that is not accurate.. and nicotine is the only ingredient in common with ecigs. Simply put the FDA cannot extend their tobacco regulations to include ecigs and city councils need to re-evaluate what they think they are talking about. Truth be told I thought one of the major less talked about reasons the city does not want smoking in public places is due to cigarette butts being tossed on the ground.. nobody wants to walk in the park or the beach full of butts.. if not that then it could only be do to the idea that second hand vape is malicious, which is easy to prove false.