Polosa and Farsalinos respond to BMJ article claiming safety of e-cigs needs to be proved

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
[h=2]Scientific evidence clearly indicates e-cigarettes are considerably less harmful than tobacco cigarettes[/h]
We were dismayed by the approach of Valentine and Nicholson to the issue of e-cigarettes [1]. Of course, unexpected health consequences may occur in the medical profession as it has been also the case with several medications, such as thalidomide, cerivastatin and rofecoxib to name a few. But this cannot be used as a valid argument to oppose e-cigarettes. They suggest e-cigarettes should be quarantined until results from long-term studies are available, while in reality this is not a requirement for any other product approved for human consumption. Even for medications, no regulatory agency is asking for long-term safety data before being approved for use. Although some problems have emerged, such as the recent story with olmesartan [2], this cannot justify a request to provide long-term studies before approval of medications; it will just be impossible for anyone to cope with the financial cost, while at the same time evolution of new medications will become very slow.


Read more: http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g4597/rr/760890

Notice that there is a "Like" button.

mod: Please correct spelling for Dr. Farsalinos in Post title. Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,250
7,651
Green Lane, Pa
If you hit the tab button at the top of the page that says "rapid response" there is a great response written by a Emeritus Professor Robert Lewin............very good..............you can also like that one.
Also there is one from Clive Bates:)

There are three great responses and one other which has exactly 0 likes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread