Welcome to ECF , make yourself right at home
The FSPTCA was never intended to cover e-cigarettes. Regulating e-cigarettes in the manner required by that statute leads to harmful consequences and absurd results. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say the consequences will be deadly.Ok, I'm way overdue in joining this forum. My name is Mike and I am the federal lobbyist for SFATA. Yep, it's my job to change the FDA deeming rule and more. Gonna need all of your help and hard work - but fun also likely to be had.
Let's do this!
I'm not sure about that at all. The way I see it, the intent was to prevent ANY new product from taking market share away from the big three cigarette companies.The FSPTCA was never intended to cover e-cigarettes.
Thanks for the warm welcome. It probably won't happen until next year, but this is the plan: Step 1 - change predicate date so all current products can remain. Step 2 - move vaping regulation outside of punitive Center for Tobacco Product regime to encourage harm reduction. Going to need all of your help tho!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Welcome! And thank you for fighting for the vapers ! I have a question and that is if Vaping is categorized as harm reduction does that mean it will be regulated as a drug rather than tobacco product ?
Welcome to the ECF Mike.
So How Exactly can a Business or Individual give you the Help that you Need?
The FSPTCA was never intended to cover e-cigarettes. Regulating e-cigarettes in the manner required by that statute leads to harmful consequences and absurd results. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say the consequences will be deadly.
The best remedy would be to simply amend the FSPTCA to exclude e-cigarette products from the definition of "tobacco product" and at the same time enact a new statute which would allow continued product improvements and market expansion (which will happen in the rest of the world) and provide for common sense regulations dealing with product purity and harmful ingredients. I realize that there a those here who oppose all regulation. I understand that point of view, but it's not going to happen.
ZoiDman, it's kind of like the snowball effect. The boss of FDA is Congress. Contrary to popular opinion, they are actually quite sensitive to public (our) opinion. I have seen and been involved in dozens of issue campaigns and have no doubt that if 40% of us would have a conversation with one local reporter, and two staffers for our uS Senators, they would change the grandfather date - allowing all products currently in the market to stay on the market- and then create a smarter regulatory structure for vaping . So that's it: talk to one local reporter, and your two Senate staffer LD who handle FDA issues.
Please?????
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Some of us would make you look like a lightweight.'m so please you guys are so passionate and willing to fight!