Walking away is a perfectly valid response. In many cases, it's the only valid response. You are quite correct to do as you do, IMO. But I wouldn't judge anyone else for arguing with the guy in the OP (or his ilk), either.
I doubt I'm alone on all of the above. This thread, like so many...
Reread Myranny's statement in red. It doesn't say what you're pretending it does; here, I'll bold the part you've apparently missed:
"Anyone that expects anyone [else] to not defend themselves when confronted IS actively doing the work of the other side which in vapings case is the ANTZ."
If...
And you will have typed out at least 20 absurdly reductive straw men without ever addressing a single argument respectfully and logically. Cause that's how you roll, based on what I've seen.
I haven't seen anyone in this thread state outright that he advocates openly disrespectful vaping in...
Yes, yes, your rhetorical games are very cute. Here's a cookie.
If you had started this conversation with a straightforward account of all the relevant facts as you see them, then we could have discussed the matter like adults. But your habit of leaving us with clear implications and then...
Their question was a transparent and anti-rational trap. And you repeated it here not only as if it were a valid question, but as if it were the question to end all debate.
If you cannot see that, then you're absolutely right: there's no point in discussing the matter with you further...
Then they're incompetent. There is no alternative; if you're trying to design a fair and reasonable policy, and your best inquiry assumes that the policy is already reasonable, then you're either arrogant or you're irrational, and thus unqualified for the task.
That would be a fair question...
That's because it's a trap question, based on a tautological premise. It's designed to distract you with an irrelevant discussion about e-cig usage habits, when what you should be asking is why the conversation's reasonable in the first place.
"LOL, of course vapers don't need to vape in...
Trust me, I LOLed too when you trotted out that question as if it were the end-all be-all. If real college policy makers really are that arrogant, then the situation's too depressing for anything other than laughter.
That's a loaded question; it assumes the arguer's conclusion by equating cigarettes with e-cigs even as the arguer claims to probe the issue as to whether they should be compared:
"Let's restrict the living snot out of cigarette use, and then we can use the fact that cigarette smokers...
Right, which leads to the notable practical downside that cotton wicks need to be replaced more often than silica wicks.
So for most people, I imagine cotton > silica in an at-home context, and silica > cotton everywhere else.
Well said. ECF kindly archived the content of Ms T's defunct supplier forum, but that forum is neither active nor in the right section anymore. A perusal of the Rules for Forum Suppliers makes very clear that Ms T's forum ain't coming back any time soon: note particularly the wording in rule...
Most ANTZ arguments wouldn't pass muster in a grade-school composition class. It's no surprise that their scientific reasoning leaves much to be desired. It's definitely annoying that people can make comfortable livings spewing obvious idiocy, though.
C'est la vie.
Heh, it's 300 full charges before your battery should start to lose its ability to hold a charge.
So barring a defect, and assuming you keep two batteries in rotation (and assuming you sleep roughly 1/3rd of every day), each batt should last at least a year.
Psyche, well done. :)
It's amazing that these petty tyrants think it's reasonable even to ban cigarettes in private cars, much less e-cigarettes. Don't they have anything better to do? What do they think they'll accomplish with this nonsense?
Sounds like you were having fun without the FDA's approval. Are you sure that's wise?
I like it: one wrote science fiction; the other exposes fictitious science. :)
It's damn good reading, though. Thanks for all you do.
(Emphasis mine.)
I think there are a lot of good juices out there mixed by more deserving people than Ms T. But if you feel it isn't worth your trouble to find a satisfactory alternative to Ms T, then that's fine.
It's regrettable that you feel your best option is to line the pockets of a...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.