This was recently posted on YouTube. Brilliant, well done, and really really funny.
(I wasn't sure which sub-forum to post this on, so am posting in General and hope the moderators will kindly sort it out. TY!)
When I went to the doctor -- first time in 20+ years and a month after I switched to ecigs -- the intake form asked if I smoked. I answered No. If it had asked "Do you use e-cigarettes?" I'd have answered yes. But they didn't ask.
Always answer the question asked, not the question implied.
Have not read it yet, so post it here FYI w/o comment: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/UCM416498.pdf
According to tweets posted by various Ashton supporters, he's offering the schoolyard bully's classic retort: "But *they* started it!" Which of course is bollocks, as canny vaping tweeters took screenshots of his offensive tweets that he quickly deleted, which show the correct timeline.
No...
FYI, FPH has posted the following statement on its website: UK Faculty of Public Health :: Home
So. "Strong disapproval" and "mitigating circumstances" and it's back to business as usual. :facepalm:
The more I think about this, the more I think it's big, that they're acknowledging that ecigs have a place in the in-hospital life of their patients.
As for requiring patients to purchase from the hospital, I don't agree with it but it doesn't surprise me at all. Hospitals charge patients for...
Apparently, the "war" on Rx drug abuse isn't as well funded as the "war" on vaping. Do I have to point out the obvious as to who's doing the funding? I doubt it...
Unfortunately, Clive Bates will never, *never,* NEVER be invited to testify at a Senate hearing. He's articulate and science-based, but above all, he's not a member of the ANTZ cabal willing to read from the ANTZ propaganda playbook script.
To inject some data relating to OP: I did a bit of "shallow" sleuthing on CLS last night and since I'm feeling a bit lazy today, will simply post the notes I made during the sleuth:
This search was single-source, at whitepages.com.
So I guess the term "public" in this instance means "not government (but still scientists)," and not, you know, *us.*
God forbid they should hold a workshop in which they'd have to listen to, you know, *us.*
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.